-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 25.6k
Optimize usage calculation in ILM policies retrieval API #106953
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Changes from 15 commits
5bf393c
d160dc2
092cb0c
16f3d83
d30376e
24acf2c
293ff9d
02fb7a2
e193a30
532e3d1
473415c
4cd9bfb
fe9ae0d
3641d1a
5a101fe
145ce7d
d346665
5e7c011
2559a98
6bddee0
8b894d6
27b84f3
7c416c4
File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Jump to
Diff view
Diff view
There are no files selected for viewing
| Original file line number | Diff line number | Diff line change |
|---|---|---|
| @@ -0,0 +1,6 @@ | ||
| pr: 106953 | ||
| summary: Optimize usage calculation in ILM policies retrieval API | ||
| area: ILM+SLM | ||
| type: enhancement | ||
| issues: | ||
| - 105773 |
| Original file line number | Diff line number | Diff line change |
|---|---|---|
| @@ -0,0 +1,126 @@ | ||
| /* | ||
| * Copyright Elasticsearch B.V. and/or licensed to Elasticsearch B.V. under one | ||
| * or more contributor license agreements. Licensed under the Elastic License | ||
| * 2.0; you may not use this file except in compliance with the Elastic License | ||
| * 2.0. | ||
| */ | ||
|
|
||
| package org.elasticsearch.xpack.core.ilm; | ||
|
|
||
| import org.apache.lucene.util.CollectionUtil; | ||
| import org.elasticsearch.action.support.IndicesOptions; | ||
| import org.elasticsearch.cluster.ClusterState; | ||
| import org.elasticsearch.cluster.metadata.ComposableIndexTemplate; | ||
| import org.elasticsearch.cluster.metadata.IndexMetadata; | ||
| import org.elasticsearch.cluster.metadata.IndexNameExpressionResolver; | ||
| import org.elasticsearch.cluster.metadata.ItemUsage; | ||
| import org.elasticsearch.cluster.metadata.MetadataIndexTemplateService; | ||
| import org.elasticsearch.common.regex.Regex; | ||
| import org.elasticsearch.common.settings.Settings; | ||
| import org.elasticsearch.common.util.Maps; | ||
|
|
||
| import java.util.ArrayList; | ||
| import java.util.Comparator; | ||
| import java.util.List; | ||
| import java.util.Map; | ||
|
|
||
| /** | ||
| * A class that can be used to calculate the usages of ILM policies across the cluster. The class makes a tradeoff by using some more memory | ||
| * (but not a lot) to significantly improve the processing time. | ||
| */ | ||
| public class LifecyclePolicyUsageCalculator { | ||
|
|
||
| /** A map from policy name to list of composable templates that use that policy. */ | ||
| private final Map<String, List<String>> policyToTemplates; | ||
| /** A map from policy name to list of data streams that use that policy. */ | ||
| private final Map<String, List<String>> policyToDataStreams; | ||
| /** A map from policy name to list of indices that use that policy. */ | ||
| private final Map<String, List<String>> policyToIndices; | ||
|
|
||
| public LifecyclePolicyUsageCalculator( | ||
| final IndexNameExpressionResolver indexNameExpressionResolver, | ||
| final ClusterState state, | ||
| List<String> requestedPolicyNames | ||
| ) { | ||
| final List<String> allDataStreams = indexNameExpressionResolver.dataStreamNames( | ||
| state, | ||
| IndicesOptions.LENIENT_EXPAND_OPEN_CLOSED_HIDDEN_NO_SELECTOR | ||
| ); | ||
| // Sort all templates by descending priority. That way, findV2Template can exit on the first found template. | ||
| final var indexTemplates = new ArrayList<>(state.metadata().templatesV2().entrySet()); | ||
| CollectionUtil.timSort(indexTemplates, Comparator.comparing(entry -> entry.getValue().priorityOrZero(), Comparator.reverseOrder())); | ||
|
|
||
| final IndexLifecycleMetadata metadata = state.metadata().custom(IndexLifecycleMetadata.TYPE); | ||
| // We're making a bet here that if the `name` contains a wildcard, there's a large chance it'll simply match all policies. | ||
| final var expectedSize = Regex.isSimpleMatchPattern(requestedPolicyNames.get(0)) | ||
| ? metadata.getPolicyMetadatas().size() | ||
| : requestedPolicyNames.size(); | ||
|
|
||
| // We keep a map from composable template name to policy name to avoid having to resolve the template settings to determine | ||
| // the template's policy twice. | ||
| final Map<String, String> templateToPolicy = Maps.newHashMapWithExpectedSize(indexTemplates.size()); | ||
|
||
|
|
||
| // Build the maps that will be used for the usage calculation later on. | ||
| policyToTemplates = Maps.newHashMapWithExpectedSize(expectedSize); | ||
| for (Map.Entry<String, ComposableIndexTemplate> entry : state.metadata().templatesV2().entrySet()) { | ||
| Settings settings = MetadataIndexTemplateService.resolveSettings(entry.getValue(), state.metadata().componentTemplates()); | ||
| final var policyName = LifecycleSettings.LIFECYCLE_NAME_SETTING.get(settings); | ||
| // We only store the template if its policy matched any of the requested names. | ||
| if (doesPolicyMatchAnyName(policyName, requestedPolicyNames) == false) { | ||
| continue; | ||
| } | ||
| policyToTemplates.computeIfAbsent(policyName, k -> new ArrayList<>()).add(entry.getKey()); | ||
| templateToPolicy.put(entry.getKey(), policyName); | ||
| } | ||
|
|
||
| policyToDataStreams = Maps.newHashMapWithExpectedSize(expectedSize); | ||
| for (String dataStream : allDataStreams) { | ||
| String indexTemplate = MetadataIndexTemplateService.findV2TemplateFromSortedList( | ||
| state.metadata(), | ||
| indexTemplates, | ||
| dataStream, | ||
| false | ||
| ); | ||
| if (indexTemplate == null) { | ||
| // Every data stream should ordinarily have an index template, so this branch should not fire under normal circumstances. | ||
| continue; | ||
| } | ||
| final var policyName = templateToPolicy.get(indexTemplate); | ||
| // If there was no entry, either the template didn't specify an ILM policy or the policy didn't match any of the requested names | ||
| if (policyName == null) { | ||
| continue; | ||
| } | ||
| policyToDataStreams.computeIfAbsent(policyName, k -> new ArrayList<>()).add(dataStream); | ||
| } | ||
|
|
||
| policyToIndices = Maps.newHashMapWithExpectedSize(expectedSize); | ||
| for (IndexMetadata indexMetadata : state.metadata().indices().values()) { | ||
| final var policyName = indexMetadata.getLifecyclePolicyName(); | ||
| // We only store the index if its policy matched any of the specified names. | ||
| if (doesPolicyMatchAnyName(policyName, requestedPolicyNames) == false) { | ||
| continue; | ||
| } | ||
| policyToIndices.computeIfAbsent(policyName, k -> new ArrayList<>()).add(indexMetadata.getIndex().getName()); | ||
| } | ||
| } | ||
|
|
||
| /** | ||
| * Retrieves the pre-calculated indices, data streams, and composable templates that use the given policy. | ||
| */ | ||
| public ItemUsage retrieveCalculatedUsage(String policyName) { | ||
| return new ItemUsage( | ||
| policyToIndices.getOrDefault(policyName, List.of()), | ||
| policyToDataStreams.getOrDefault(policyName, List.of()), | ||
| policyToTemplates.getOrDefault(policyName, List.of()) | ||
| ); | ||
| } | ||
|
|
||
| private boolean doesPolicyMatchAnyName(String policyName, List<String> names) { | ||
| for (var name : names) { | ||
| if (Regex.simpleMatch(name, policyName)) { | ||
| return true; | ||
| } | ||
| } | ||
| return false; | ||
| } | ||
| } | ||
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.