-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 25.6k
Backport incremental bulk execution #113215
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Merged
Tim-Brooks
merged 21 commits into
elastic:8.x
from
Tim-Brooks:partial-rest-requests-rebase-8.x
Sep 20, 2024
Merged
Backport incremental bulk execution #113215
Tim-Brooks
merged 21 commits into
elastic:8.x
from
Tim-Brooks:partial-rest-requests-rebase-8.x
Sep 20, 2024
Conversation
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
…lastic#112967) Mainly motivated by simplifying the reference chains for Netty buffers and have easier to analyze heap dumps in some spots but also a small performance win in and of itself.
Allow a single bulk request to be passed to Elasticsearch in multiple parts. Once a certain memory threshold or number of operations have been received, the request can be split and submitted for processing.
This commit splits bulks once memory usage for indexing pressure has passed a configurable threshold.
Integrate the incremental bulks into RestBulkAction
Currently the rest.incremental_bulk is read in two different places. This means that it will be employed in two steps introducing unpredictable behavior. This commit ensures that it is only read in a single place.
The header validator is very aggressive about adjusting autoread on the belief it is the only place where autoread is tweaked. However, with stream backpressure, we should only change it when we are starting or finishing header validation.
Currently, unless a rest handler specifies that it handles "unsafe" buffers, we must copy the http buffers in releaseAndCopy. Unfortuantely, the original content was slipping through in the initial stream PR. This less to memory corruption on index and update requests which depend on buffers being copied.
Currently, the entire close pipeline is not hooked up in case of a channel close while a request is being buffered or executed. This commit resolves the issue by adding a connection to a stream closure.
This commit ensures we properly throw exceptions when an empty bulk request is received with the incremental handling enabled.
Spotless broke during a rebase. Fixing in this commit.
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Labels
backport
:Distributed Indexing/CRUD
A catch all label for issues around indexing, updating and getting a doc by id. Not search.
>non-issue
v8.16.0
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
This commit back ports all of the work introduced in:
#113044