-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 25.7k
Small for-loop cleanup #120131
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Closed
DiannaHohensee
wants to merge
2
commits into
elastic:main
from
DiannaHohensee:2025/01/14/ES-10341-cleanup
Closed
Small for-loop cleanup #120131
Changes from all commits
Commits
Show all changes
2 commits
Select commit
Hold shift + click to select a range
File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
There are no files selected for viewing
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
nodesAllocationStatsAndWeightsusesRoutingNodes, butRoutingNodecan have at most oneDiscoveryNodeornull(I'm looking at Nullable node property). Potentiallyallocation.nodes().get(nodeStatsAndWeight.getKey());might return null when RoutingNode does not have DiscoveryNode specified, right?There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Thanks for looking into it. Following the
allocation.routingNodes()andallocation.nodes()methods down, it looks like the routing nodes are instantiated here. It looks reasonable that the routing nodes has all of the nodes, from this code, but there are no interface guarantees that I see to feel good about that conclusion..Looks like the Nullable was added in this commit, probably as a performance edge case.
Eh. I feel like it should have all the nodes, but also there are no guarantees around that, so this change probably isn't safe as the RoutingNodes code is today.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Do you want to pursue this PR or close it?