Use LogsDB for profiling events to reduce storage footprint #122034
Merged
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
In experiments we found out that LogsDB reduces storage costs of profiling events data by ~30% in comparison to what we have today.
Keeping this in draft until benchmarks confirm that we won't have regressions in query latency or index latency.
The
cloud-deploylabel creates an artifact that can be used fur rally benchmarks or testing.Benchmark summary:
(storage costs is the greatest concern atm)