Skip to content

Remove @UpdateForV9 annotation from ReindexRequest#failOnSizeSpecified #122729

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Merged
arteam merged 6 commits into from
Feb 17, 2025
Merged

Remove @UpdateForV9 annotation from ReindexRequest#failOnSizeSpecified #122729

Show file tree
Hide file tree
Changes from 4 commits
Commits
Show all changes
6 commits
Select commit Hold shift + click to select a range
49842b8
Remove `@UpdateForV9` annotation from `ReindexRequest#failOnSizeSpeci…
arteam Feb 17, 2025
8de4075
Merge branch 'main' into remove-updatev9-reindex-request
arteam Feb 17, 2025
9914525
Deprecate special handling of ReindexRequest#size
arteam Feb 17, 2025
2620796
Adjust regex for catching both new and old size error messages
arteam Feb 17, 2025
064ede8
Don't run `reindex/20_validation/specifying size fails` in 8.x compat…
arteam Feb 17, 2025
b27d143
Merge branch 'main' into remove-updatev9-reindex-request
arteam Feb 17, 2025
File filter

Filter by extension

Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
2 changes: 1 addition & 1 deletion modules/reindex/src/yamlRestTest/resources/rest-api-spec/test/reindex/20_validation.yml
View file
Open in desktop
Original file line number Diff line number Diff line change
Expand Up @@ -107,7 +107,7 @@
body: { "text": "test" }

- do:
catch: /invalid parameter \[size\], use \[max_docs\] instead/
Copy link
Contributor

@DaveCTurner DaveCTurner Feb 17, 2025

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Could we instead keep the test but generalize this regex to handle both the old specialized message and the new general one?

Copy link
Contributor Author

@arteam arteam Feb 17, 2025

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Thanks, I've updated it!

catch: /(invalid parameter \[size\], use \[max_docs\] instead|unknown field \[size\])/
reindex:
body:
source:
Expand Down
11 changes: 0 additions & 11 deletions server/src/main/java/org/elasticsearch/index/reindex/ReindexRequest.java
View file
Open in desktop
Original file line number Diff line number Diff line change
Expand Up @@ -21,7 +21,6 @@
import org.elasticsearch.common.settings.SecureString;
import org.elasticsearch.common.xcontent.XContentHelper;
import org.elasticsearch.core.TimeValue;
import org.elasticsearch.core.UpdateForV9;
import org.elasticsearch.features.NodeFeature;
import org.elasticsearch.index.VersionType;
import org.elasticsearch.index.query.QueryBuilder;
Expand Down Expand Up @@ -355,10 +354,6 @@ public XContentBuilder toXContent(XContentBuilder builder, Params params) throws
);

PARSER.declareInt(ReindexRequest::setMaxDocsValidateIdentical, new ParseField("max_docs"));

// avoid silently accepting an ignored size.
PARSER.declareInt((r, s) -> failOnSizeSpecified(), new ParseField("size"));

PARSER.declareField((p, v, c) -> v.setScript(Script.parse(p)), new ParseField("script"), ObjectParser.ValueType.OBJECT);
PARSER.declareString(ReindexRequest::setConflicts, new ParseField("conflicts"));
}
Expand Down Expand Up @@ -498,10 +493,4 @@ static void setMaxDocsValidateIdentical(AbstractBulkByScrollRequest<?> request,
request.setMaxDocs(maxDocs);
}
}

@UpdateForV9(owner = UpdateForV9.Owner.DISTRIBUTED_INDEXING)
// do we still need this ref to [max_docs] or can we remove the field entirely so it's rejected with the default message?
private static void failOnSizeSpecified() {
throw new IllegalArgumentException("invalid parameter [size], use [max_docs] instead");
}
}