-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 25.7k
Updating TransportRolloverAction.checkBlock so that non-write-index blocks do not prevent data stream rollover #122905
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Merged
Merged
Changes from all commits
Commits
Show all changes
13 commits
Select commit
Hold shift + click to select a range
e6f118a
Updating TransportRolloverAction.checkBlock so that non-write-index b…
masseyke d5cd8d5
Update docs/changelog/122905.yaml
masseyke fb78a53
adding a check for nonexistent failure store
masseyke d31b768
Merge branch 'rollover-action-checkBlock' of github.com:masseyke/elas…
masseyke 64bc640
fixing DataStreamLifecycleServiceIT
masseyke 4375b13
adding unit tests
masseyke 028e139
Merge branch 'main' into rollover-action-checkBlock
masseyke 10bf632
Fixing and test support for failure stores
masseyke db52cb9
Merge branch 'main' into rollover-action-checkBlock
masseyke bba78bc
reducing the number of return statements
masseyke 2dd621b
Merge branch 'rollover-action-checkBlock' of github.com:masseyke/elas…
masseyke 10a2023
Fixing test comment
masseyke 805d6db
Merge branch 'main' into rollover-action-checkBlock
masseyke File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
There are no files selected for viewing
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
| Original file line number | Diff line number | Diff line change |
|---|---|---|
| @@ -0,0 +1,6 @@ | ||
| pr: 122905 | ||
| summary: Updating `TransportRolloverAction.checkBlock` so that non-write-index blocks | ||
| do not prevent data stream rollover | ||
| area: Data streams | ||
| type: bug | ||
| issues: [] |
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Do we support rollover on data stream aliases? If so, would this get tripped up on one?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
That's a good question! But fortunately this code is in masterOperation: https://github.com/elastic/elasticsearch/blob/main/server/src/main/java/org/elasticsearch/action/admin/indices/rollover/TransportRolloverAction.java#L238-L243: