Skip to content

Conversation

@craigtaverner
Copy link
Contributor

Backports the following commits to 9.0:

The original work at elastic#106065 did not support geospatial types with this comment:

> I made this work for everything but geo_point and cartesian_point because I'm not 100% sure how to integrate with those. We can grab those in a follow up.

The geospatial types should be possible to collect using the VALUES aggregation with similar behavior to the `ST_COLLECT` OGC function, based on the Elasticsearch convention that treats multi-value geospatial fields as behaving similarly to any geometry collection. So this implementation is a trivial addition to the existing values types support.
@craigtaverner craigtaverner added :Analytics/ES|QL AKA ESQL >bug auto-merge-without-approval Automatically merge pull request when CI checks pass (NB doesn't wait for reviews!) backport Team:Analytics Meta label for analytical engine team (ESQL/Aggs/Geo) labels Feb 25, 2025
@elasticsearchmachine elasticsearchmachine merged commit 4e5f9b8 into elastic:9.0 Feb 25, 2025
16 checks passed
@craigtaverner craigtaverner deleted the backport/9.0/pr-122886 branch February 25, 2025 11:50
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

:Analytics/ES|QL AKA ESQL auto-merge-without-approval Automatically merge pull request when CI checks pass (NB doesn't wait for reviews!) backport >bug Team:Analytics Meta label for analytical engine team (ESQL/Aggs/Geo) v9.0.1

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants