Skip to content

[9.0] Remove @UpdateForV9 annotations from Security code (#123176) #124686

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom
Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Mar 12, 2025
Merged

[9.0] Remove @UpdateForV9 annotations from Security code (#123176) #124686

merged 1 commit into from
Mar 12, 2025

Conversation

@mattc58
Copy link
Contributor

@mattc58 mattc58 commented Mar 12, 2025

Backports the following commits to 9.0:

@mattc58 mattc58 requested a review from a team as a code owner March 12, 2025 22:33
@mattc58 mattc58 added :Security/License License functionality for commercial features :Security/Security Security issues without another label >non-issue auto-merge-without-approval Automatically merge pull request when CI checks pass (NB doesn't wait for reviews!) backport Team:Security Meta label for security team labels Mar 12, 2025
@elasticsearchmachine elasticsearchmachine mentioned this pull request Mar 12, 2025
Merged
@elasticsearchmachine elasticsearchmachine merged commit 1a746ce into elastic:9.0 Mar 12, 2025
21 checks passed
@mattc58 mattc58 deleted the backport/9.0/pr-123176 branch March 12, 2025 23:33
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Reviewers

No reviews

Assignees

No one assigned

Labels

auto-merge-without-approval Automatically merge pull request when CI checks pass (NB doesn't wait for reviews!) backport >non-issue :Security/License License functionality for commercial features :Security/Security Security issues without another label Team:Security Meta label for security team v9.0.1

Projects

None yet

Milestone

No milestone

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants

@mattc58 @elasticsearchmachine