Skip to content

Conversation

@original-brownbear
Copy link
Contributor

We don't need the result to be a SearchPhaseResults. In fact, there is no reason for it to be a nested class in the first place. Just flatten it into the phase itself and synchronize on this.

This is just a step on the way to #116881 that makes that PR much easier to review I believe.

back port of #118558

We don't need the result to be a `SearchPhaseResults`. In fact,
there is no reason for it to be a nested class in the first place.
Just flatten it into the phase itself and synchronize on `this`.

This is just a step on the way to #116881 that makes that PR much easier to review I believe.
@original-brownbear original-brownbear added backport auto-merge-without-approval Automatically merge pull request when CI checks pass (NB doesn't wait for reviews!) labels Mar 14, 2025
@elasticsearchmachine elasticsearchmachine merged commit 9bbd171 into elastic:8.x Mar 14, 2025
15 checks passed
@original-brownbear original-brownbear deleted the 118558-8.x branch March 14, 2025 13:47
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

auto-merge-without-approval Automatically merge pull request when CI checks pass (NB doesn't wait for reviews!) backport v8.19.0

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants