-
Couldn't load subscription status.
- Fork 25.6k
Add FailedShardEntry info to shard-failed task source string #125520
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Merged
Merged
Changes from 3 commits
Commits
Show all changes
8 commits
Select commit
Hold shift + click to select a range
4bfa21a
Add FailedShardEntry info to shard-failed task source string
JeremyDahlgren 064b2fe
Update docs/changelog/125520.yaml
JeremyDahlgren 25d46b5
Don't include stack trace in source string, add unit test case
JeremyDahlgren 0f7b047
Switch to adding a new test case in ShardStateIT
JeremyDahlgren 0f5fb12
Merge branch 'main' into fix/102606
JeremyDahlgren c3698fa
Simplify integration test case
JeremyDahlgren f3b0720
Address code review comments
JeremyDahlgren 6a41914
Merge branch 'main' into fix/102606
JeremyDahlgren File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
There are no files selected for viewing
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
| Original file line number | Diff line number | Diff line change |
|---|---|---|
| @@ -0,0 +1,6 @@ | ||
| pr: 125520 | ||
| summary: Add `FailedShardEntry` info to shard-failed task source string | ||
| area: Allocation | ||
| type: enhancement | ||
| issues: | ||
| - 102606 |
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Oops, something went wrong.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I'd prefer an integration test for this change which will more directly get the information from
MasterServiceinstead of mocking the queue and bypassingMasterService. Technically, what an user sees is thesourcefield of PendingClusterTask and that is what we want to fix. Currently it is indeed copied all the way from thesourceargument ofsubmitTaskmethod. But I'd rather to not make that implementation assumption in the test.Concretely, I think we can add a test to
ShardStateITthat does the following:IndicesServicesimilar to this. For simplicity, the index can have just 1 shard and no replica.assertThat(clusterService.getMasterService().pendingTasks().stream().anyMatch(t -> t.getSource()...)wrapped in anassertBusy.There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Thanks @ywangd, I've switched to an integration test in 0f7b047 per your outline.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I simplified the test per our call earlier, commit c3698fa. I'll use a separate branch to investigate the possible race condition in the version that attempts to block and wait for the shard-started task.