Skip to content

Conversation

@luigidellaquila
Copy link
Contributor

@luigidellaquila luigidellaquila commented Apr 2, 2025

Trying to enable tests that generate random queries.
Only single node for now. If it's not too noisy we'll also have to enable it in multi-node.

@luigidellaquila luigidellaquila added >test Issues or PRs that are addressing/adding tests :Analytics/ES|QL AKA ESQL labels Apr 2, 2025
@elasticsearchmachine elasticsearchmachine added Team:Analytics Meta label for analytical engine team (ESQL/Aggs/Geo) v9.1.0 labels Apr 2, 2025
@elasticsearchmachine
Copy link
Collaborator

Pinging @elastic/es-analytical-engine (Team:Analytics)

result.append(randomName(previousOutput));
String fieldName = randomRawName(previousOutput);
if (fieldName.isEmpty()) { // it's a bug, managed later, skipping for now
randomAlphaOfLength(5);
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Should this assign to a fieldName?
If so consider using randomIdentifier() instead.

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Aaahhh, automerged too quickly...
Yeah, it should assign to fieldName

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

quick fix here #126107

@luigidellaquila luigidellaquila enabled auto-merge (squash) April 2, 2025 08:52
@luigidellaquila luigidellaquila merged commit cc54010 into elastic:main Apr 2, 2025
15 of 17 checks passed
andreidan pushed a commit to andreidan/elasticsearch that referenced this pull request Apr 9, 2025
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

:Analytics/ES|QL AKA ESQL Team:Analytics Meta label for analytical engine team (ESQL/Aggs/Geo) >test Issues or PRs that are addressing/adding tests v9.1.0

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants