-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 25.6k
Fix race condition in RestCancellableNodeClient
#126686
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Merged
elasticsearchmachine
merged 4 commits into
elastic:main
from
DaveCTurner:2025/04/11/RestCancellableNodeClient-reuse-bug
Apr 11, 2025
Merged
Changes from 3 commits
Commits
Show all changes
4 commits
Select commit
Hold shift + click to select a range
9550716
Fix race condition in `RestCancellableNodeClient`
DaveCTurner 8c6c017
Merge branch 'main' into 2025/04/11/RestCancellableNodeClient-reuse-bug
DaveCTurner fa9c300
Update docs/changelog/126686.yaml
DaveCTurner 20f492f
Nullable rather than separate flag
DaveCTurner File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
There are no files selected for viewing
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
| Original file line number | Diff line number | Diff line change |
|---|---|---|
| @@ -0,0 +1,6 @@ | ||
| pr: 126686 | ||
| summary: Fix race condition in `RestCancellableNodeClient` | ||
| area: Task Management | ||
| type: bug | ||
| issues: | ||
| - 88201 |
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Oops, something went wrong.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
NIT: whatever you prefer really but to me it seems that in these spots it's mostly easier to just make
tasksnon-final andnullist out to signaltasksDrained, removing the need for the copy and somewhat hardening the design against adding a task after tasks have been drained?It's also one less field which is always nice :)
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Yeah fair enough, see 20f492f. Required adding more null checks than I initially expected...
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Ah right the stats :) thanks!