Renamed the feature flag that controls when default Lucene posting format is used #128236
Conversation
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
…rmat is used. Addressed comment from elastic#126080
martijnvg
force-pushed
the
PerFieldFormatSupplierDefaultPostingsFormatTweak
branch
from
8d37e75 to
a60be8e
Compare
martijnvg
changed the title
|
Pinging @elastic/es-storage-engine (Team:StorageEngine) |
ChrisHegarty
approved these changes
May 21, 2025
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Awesome, thank you @martijnvg. LGTM. ( now, when the new Lucene 10.3 format is available it will seamlessly become the default when this flag is enabled )
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
3 participants
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Renamed the feature flag that controls when default Lucene posting format is used.
And moved replaced
lucene101PostingsFormatfromPerFieldFormatSupplierconstant toElasticsearch900Lucene101Codec.Addressed comment from #126080