Skip to content

Conversation

@martijnvg
Copy link
Member

All the development work has been completed in #126111 and no regressions have been observer in nightly benchmarks.

All the development work has been completed in elastic#126111
and no regressions have been observer in nightly benchmarks.
@elasticsearchmachine
Copy link
Collaborator

Pinging @elastic/es-storage-engine (Team:StorageEngine)

@martijnvg martijnvg added the auto-backport Automatically create backport pull requests when merged label May 26, 2025
@martijnvg
Copy link
Member Author

@elasticmachine update branch

@martijnvg
Copy link
Member Author

Unrelated test failure:

�_bk;t=1748246171941�REPRODUCE WITH: ./gradlew ":qa:x-pack-rest-test:yamlRestTest" --tests "co.elastic.elasticsearch.qa.rest.ServerlessXpackRestIT.test {yaml=ml/set_upgrade_mode/Setting upgrade_mode to enabled}" -Dtests.seed=20E5155D86BD2FE9 -Dtests.locale=ff-Adlm-NG -Dtests.timezone=EST5EDT -Druntime.java=24

�_bk;t=1748246172041�

�_bk;t=1748246172045�ServerlessXpackRestIT > test {yaml=ml/set_upgrade_mode/Setting upgrade_mode to enabled} FAILED

�_bk;t=1748246172045�    java.lang.AssertionError: 2 active tasks found:

�_bk;t=1748246172045�    cluster:admin/xpack/ml/job/reset opvpIxRGT3SVzozFUuLpAg:43468  -                             transport  1748246138451 07:55:38 33s         127.0.0.1 yamlRestTest-2-kNOXrja job-set-upgrade-mode-job

�_bk;t=1748246172045�    cluster:admin/xpack/ml/job/reset wOzmi_NaQtmXA5K8d4jsPw:118290 opvpIxRGT3SVzozFUuLpAg:43468  transport  1748246138452 07:55:38 33s         127.0.0.1 index-XUOLMXd          job-set-upgrade-mode-job

�_bk;t=1748246172045�     expected:<0> but was:<2>

�_bk;t=1748246172045�        at __randomizedtesting.SeedInfo.seed([20E5155D86BD2FE9:A8B12A8728414211]:0)

�_bk;t=1748246172045�        at org.junit.Assert.fail(Assert.java:89)

�_bk;t=1748246172045�        at org.junit.Assert.failNotEquals(Assert.java:835)

�_bk;t=1748246172045�        at org.junit.Assert.assertEquals(Assert.java:647)

�_bk;t=1748246172045�        at org.elasticsearch.test.rest.ESRestTestCase.lambda$waitForPendingTasks$7(ESRestTestCase.java:717)

�_bk;t=1748246172045�        at org.elasticsearch.test.ESTestCase.assertBusy(ESTestCase.java:1481)

�_bk;t=1748246172045�        at org.elasticsearch.test.rest.ESRestTestCase.waitForPendingTasks(ESRestTestCase.java:686)

�_bk;t=1748246172045�        at org.elasticsearch.xpack.test.rest.AbstractXPackRestTest.cleanup(AbstractXPackRestTest.java:122)

�_bk;t=1748246172045�        at java.base/jdk.internal.reflect.DirectMethodHandleAccessor.invoke(DirectMethodHandleAccessor.java:104)

�_bk;t=1748246172045�        at java.base/java.lang.reflect.Method.invoke(Method.java:565)

�_bk;t=1748246172045�        at com.carrotsearch.randomizedtesting.RandomizedRunner.invoke(RandomizedRunner.java:1763)

�_bk;t=1748246172045�        at com.carrotsearch.randomizedtesting.RandomizedRunner$10.evaluate(RandomizedRunner.java:1004)

�_bk;t=1748246172045�        at com.carrotsearch.randomizedtesting.rules.StatementAdapter.evaluate(StatementAdapter.java:36)

�_bk;t=1748246172045�        at org.junit.rules.RunRules.evaluate(RunRules.java:20)

@martijnvg martijnvg merged commit 7e269a9 into elastic:main May 26, 2025
17 of 18 checks passed
martijnvg added a commit to martijnvg/elasticsearch that referenced this pull request May 26, 2025
All the development work has been completed in elastic#126111
and no regressions have been observer in nightly benchmarks
@elasticsearchmachine
Copy link
Collaborator

💚 Backport successful

Status Branch Result
8.19

martijnvg added a commit that referenced this pull request Aug 11, 2025
This PR should have merged end of May. But PR CI got stuck and never got merged.
This caused the optimized doc value merging to not be enabled in 8.19. So this PR turned into a bug fix instead of a backport.

Backports the following commits to 8.19:

Remove tsdb_doc_values_optimized_merge feature flag. (Remove tsdb_doc_values_optimized_merge feature flag. #128435)
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants