Skip to content

Conversation

@DaveCTurner
Copy link
Contributor

Backports the following commits to 9.0:

The comment in `TransportHandshaker` indicates (correctly) that we emit
a warning when talking to a chronologically-newer-yet-numerically-older
version, but the wording of the warning message is inverted and says
that the remote is chronologically-older-yet-numerically-newer. This
commit straightens out the message to match the situation it is
describing.

Relates elastic#123397
@DaveCTurner DaveCTurner added :Core/Infra/Core Core issues without another label >bug auto-merge-without-approval Automatically merge pull request when CI checks pass (NB doesn't wait for reviews!) backport Team:Core/Infra Meta label for core/infra team labels Jun 24, 2025
@elasticsearchmachine elasticsearchmachine merged commit 12ef509 into elastic:9.0 Jun 24, 2025
17 checks passed
@DaveCTurner DaveCTurner deleted the backport/9.0/pr-129904 branch June 24, 2025 18:35
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

auto-merge-without-approval Automatically merge pull request when CI checks pass (NB doesn't wait for reviews!) backport >bug :Core/Infra/Core Core issues without another label Team:Core/Infra Meta label for core/infra team v9.0.4

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants