Skip to content

Conversation

smalyshev
Copy link
Contributor

Update the description of skip_unavailable functionality with recent changes.

Copy link
Contributor

Documentation preview:

@smalyshev smalyshev marked this pull request as ready for review June 25, 2025 21:51
@elasticsearchmachine elasticsearchmachine added Team:Docs Meta label for docs team Team:Analytics Meta label for analytical engine team (ESQL/Aggs/Geo) Team:Search Foundations Meta label for the Search Foundations team in Elasticsearch labels Jun 25, 2025
@elasticsearchmachine
Copy link
Collaborator

Pinging @elastic/es-docs (Team:Docs)

@elasticsearchmachine
Copy link
Collaborator

Pinging @elastic/es-analytical-engine (Team:Analytics)

@elasticsearchmachine
Copy link
Collaborator

Pinging @elastic/es-search-foundations (Team:Search Foundations)

@smalyshev smalyshev requested review from naj-h and quux00 June 25, 2025 23:04
Copy link
Contributor

@julio-santana julio-santana left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Looks good to me - thanks, Stas!

Copy link
Contributor

@drempapis drempapis left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM

@leemthompo
Copy link
Contributor

@smalyshev I made some wording suggestions in the 9.x equivalent: elastic/docs-content#1919

@smalyshev
Copy link
Contributor Author

I'll merge it for now and if we improve the wording on 9.x we can backport.

@smalyshev smalyshev merged commit dc7beff into elastic:8.19 Jun 26, 2025
6 checks passed
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
:Analytics/ES|QL AKA ESQL >docs General docs changes >non-issue :Search Foundations/CCS Team:Analytics Meta label for analytical engine team (ESQL/Aggs/Geo) Team:Docs Meta label for docs team Team:Search Foundations Meta label for the Search Foundations team in Elasticsearch v8.19.0
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

5 participants