-
Couldn't load subscription status.
- Fork 25.6k
[Test] Wait on master node for shard started #131172
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Merged
Merged
Conversation
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
The shard started may not be visible on the master node if the wait is on a data node. In that case, the DiskThreshold monitor may use stale cluster state for releasing read-only blocks. This PR fixes it by waiting on the master node, which is the behaviour before elastic#129872. Resolves: elastic#131146
|
Pinging @elastic/es-distributed-coordination (Team:Distributed Coordination) |
DaveCTurner
approved these changes
Jul 14, 2025
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
LGTM
...nalClusterTest/java/org/elasticsearch/cluster/routing/allocation/DiskThresholdMonitorIT.java
Outdated
Show resolved
Hide resolved
…routing/allocation/DiskThresholdMonitorIT.java Co-authored-by: David Turner <[email protected]>
|
@elasticmachine update branch |
pxsalehi
approved these changes
Jul 14, 2025
|
@elasticmachine update branch |
mridula-s109
pushed a commit
to mridula-s109/elasticsearch
that referenced
this pull request
Jul 17, 2025
The shard started may not be visible on the master node if the wait is on a data node. In that case, the DiskThreshold monitor may use stale cluster state for releasing read-only blocks. This PR fixes it by waiting on the master node, which is the behaviour before elastic#129872. Resolves: elastic#131146
mridula-s109
pushed a commit
to mridula-s109/elasticsearch
that referenced
this pull request
Jul 17, 2025
The shard started may not be visible on the master node if the wait is on a data node. In that case, the DiskThreshold monitor may use stale cluster state for releasing read-only blocks. This PR fixes it by waiting on the master node, which is the behaviour before elastic#129872. Resolves: elastic#131146
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Labels
auto-merge-without-approval
Automatically merge pull request when CI checks pass (NB doesn't wait for reviews!)
:Distributed Coordination/Allocation
All issues relating to the decision making around placing a shard (both master logic & on the nodes)
Team:Distributed Coordination
Meta label for Distributed Coordination team
>test
Issues or PRs that are addressing/adding tests
v9.2.0
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
The shard started may not be visible on the master node if the wait is on a data node. In that case, the DiskThreshold monitor may use stale cluster state for releasing read-only blocks. This PR fixes it by waiting on the master node, which is the behaviour before #129872.
Resolves: #131146