Skip to content

Conversation

@dnhatn
Copy link
Member

@dnhatn dnhatn commented Jul 18, 2025

We miss checking whether a field exists when populating the dimension attributes. This issue occurs when a field exists in some, but not all target indices.

Labelled this non-issue for an unreleased bug.

@dnhatn dnhatn added >non-issue :Analytics/ES|QL AKA ESQL :StorageEngine/TSDB You know, for Metrics and removed :Analytics/ES|QL AKA ESQL labels Jul 18, 2025
@dnhatn dnhatn requested a review from kkrik-es July 18, 2025 05:10
@dnhatn dnhatn marked this pull request as ready for review July 18, 2025 05:11
@elasticsearchmachine elasticsearchmachine added Team:Analytics Meta label for analytical engine team (ESQL/Aggs/Geo) Team:StorageEngine labels Jul 18, 2025
@elasticsearchmachine
Copy link
Collaborator

Pinging @elastic/es-analytical-engine (Team:Analytics)

@elasticsearchmachine
Copy link
Collaborator

Pinging @elastic/es-storage-engine (Team:StorageEngine)

@dnhatn
Copy link
Member Author

dnhatn commented Jul 18, 2025

Thanks @idegtiarenko

@dnhatn dnhatn merged commit 9edf9f6 into elastic:main Jul 18, 2025
33 checks passed
@dnhatn dnhatn deleted the fix-ts-field-does-not-exist branch July 18, 2025 06:51
Copy link
Contributor

@kkrik-es kkrik-es left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

That was quick, thanks Nhat.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

:Analytics/ES|QL AKA ESQL >non-issue :StorageEngine/TSDB You know, for Metrics Team:Analytics Meta label for analytical engine team (ESQL/Aggs/Geo) Team:StorageEngine v9.2.0

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants