-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 25.6k
Adding a merge_type parameter to the ingest simulate API #132210
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Changes from 13 commits
f7c2d7d
2d3090d
5eef172
9e41018
e973ce6
d7c3e30
5cce105
0484138
791cdc9
40a8524
be00a10
b447813
0805181
55db16e
eda4247
82885d4
File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Jump to
Diff view
Diff view
There are no files selected for viewing
Original file line number | Diff line number | Diff line change |
---|---|---|
@@ -0,0 +1,6 @@ | ||
pr: 132210 | ||
summary: Adding a `merge_type` parameter to the ingest simulate API | ||
area: Ingest Node | ||
type: enhancement | ||
issues: | ||
- 131608 |
Original file line number | Diff line number | Diff line change |
---|---|---|
|
@@ -357,6 +357,7 @@ static TransportVersion def(int id) { | |
public static final TransportVersion COMPONENT_TEMPLATE_TRACKING_INFO = def(9_132_0_00); | ||
public static final TransportVersion TO_CHILD_BLOCK_JOIN_QUERY = def(9_133_0_00); | ||
public static final TransportVersion ML_INFERENCE_AI21_COMPLETION_ADDED = def(9_134_0_00); | ||
public static final TransportVersion SIMULATE_INGEST_MAPPING_MERGE_TYPE = def(9_135_0_00); | ||
|
||
|
||
/* | ||
* STOP! READ THIS FIRST! No, really, | ||
|
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Nit: Is it worth testing with mapping in
index_template_substitutions
orcomponent_template_substitutions
?There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Yeah it probably is.