Fix field_caps API incorrectly returning object types with types filter #132986
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Summary
This PR fixes issue #109797 where the
_field_capsAPI incorrectly returns object and nested fields when using thetypesparameter, even when those types are not included in the filter.Problem
When requesting specific field types using the
typesparameter (e.g.,types=text), the API was incorrectly including parent object fields if they had child fields matching the requested type. This behavior was inconsistent with the documented API behavior.Example
Solution
Modified the parent object inclusion logic in
FieldCapabilitiesFetcher.javato respect the types filter. Parent object/nested fields are now only included if their type is explicitly requested in the types parameter.Changes
Testing
Related Issues
Fixes #109797
Checklist
🤖 Generated with Claude Code
Co-Authored-By: Claude [email protected]