Skip to content

Conversation

pquentin
Copy link
Member

@pquentin pquentin commented Aug 29, 2025

They are used in Kibana through the JS client, and documented as Kibana-only in the docs, so the correct marker is in fact "public".

I'm planning to generate the rest-api-spec from the Elasticsearch specification, but I need to eliminate the differences first.

They are used in Kibana, and documented as Kibana-only in the documentation.
@pquentin pquentin added >non-issue auto-backport Automatically create backport pull requests when merged :Security/Profile User Profiles & Personalisation v9.2.0 v9.1.4 v9.0.7 v8.19.4 labels Aug 29, 2025
@elasticsearchmachine
Copy link
Collaborator

Pinging @elastic/es-security (Team:Security)

@elasticsearchmachine elasticsearchmachine added the Team:Security Meta label for security team label Aug 29, 2025
Copy link
Contributor

@n1v0lg n1v0lg left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Thanks for raising this @pquentin! In Serverless, these are inaccessible to users directly -- these APIs can only be called by operator users. Do we have a visibility value that captures this distinction?

@pquentin
Copy link
Member Author

pquentin commented Sep 1, 2025

Serverless availability is encoded in the Elasticsearch specification: https://github.com/elastic/elasticsearch-specification/blob/424b5471c7acdc4e4f088ed186fe7ce97db23c2b/specification/security/activate_user_profile/Request.ts#L40. rest-api-spec is only about the stack.

Copy link
Contributor

@n1v0lg n1v0lg left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM

@pquentin pquentin merged commit 1a49be5 into elastic:main Sep 5, 2025
39 checks passed
pquentin added a commit to pquentin/elasticsearch that referenced this pull request Sep 5, 2025
They are used in Kibana, and documented as Kibana-only in the documentation.
pquentin added a commit to pquentin/elasticsearch that referenced this pull request Sep 5, 2025
They are used in Kibana, and documented as Kibana-only in the documentation.
pquentin added a commit to pquentin/elasticsearch that referenced this pull request Sep 5, 2025
They are used in Kibana, and documented as Kibana-only in the documentation.
@elasticsearchmachine
Copy link
Collaborator

💚 Backport successful

Status Branch Result
9.1
9.0
8.19

elasticsearchmachine pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Sep 5, 2025
They are used in Kibana, and documented as Kibana-only in the documentation.
elasticsearchmachine pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Sep 5, 2025
They are used in Kibana, and documented as Kibana-only in the documentation.
elasticsearchmachine pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Sep 5, 2025
They are used in Kibana, and documented as Kibana-only in the documentation.
sarog pushed a commit to portsbuild/elasticsearch that referenced this pull request Sep 11, 2025
They are used in Kibana, and documented as Kibana-only in the documentation.
sarog pushed a commit to portsbuild/elasticsearch that referenced this pull request Sep 19, 2025
They are used in Kibana, and documented as Kibana-only in the documentation.
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

auto-backport Automatically create backport pull requests when merged >non-issue :Security/Profile User Profiles & Personalisation Team:Security Meta label for security team v8.19.4 v9.0.7 v9.1.4 v9.2.0

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants