Enrich after main field caps

x-pack/plugin/esql-core/src/main/java/org/elasticsearch/xpack/esql/core/expression/AttributeMap.java

@@ -244,7 +244,6 @@ private E delete(Object key) {
 
     public Set<String> attributeNames() {
         Set<String> s = Sets.newLinkedHashSetWithExpectedSize(size());
-
         for (AttributeWrapper aw : delegate.keySet()) {
             s.add(aw.attr.name());
         }

x-pack/plugin/esql/qa/testFixtures/src/main/resources/enrich.csv-spec

@@ -650,6 +650,7 @@ IDR       |  Indore       |  POINT(75.8472 22.7167)  |  India      |  POINT(75.8
 fieldsInOtherIndicesBug
 required_capability: enrich_load
 required_capability: fix_replace_missing_field_with_null_duplicate_name_id_in_layout
+required_capability: dense_vector_field_type
 
 from *
 | keep author.keyword, book_no, scalerank, street, bytes_in, @timestamp, abbrev, city_location, distance, description, birth_date, language_code, intersects, client_ip, event_duration, version

x-pack/plugin/esql/qa/testFixtures/src/main/resources/lookup-join.csv-spec

@@ -1673,6 +1673,7 @@ null      |1952-02-27T00:00:00.000Z
 enrichLookupStatsBug
 required_capability: join_lookup_v12
 required_capability: fix_replace_missing_field_with_null_duplicate_name_id_in_layout
+required_capability: dense_vector_field_type
 
 from *
 | enrich languages_policy on cluster

x-pack/plugin/esql/src/main/java/org/elasticsearch/xpack/esql/analysis/EnrichResolution.java

@@ -11,7 +11,6 @@
 import org.elasticsearch.xpack.esql.enrich.ResolvedEnrichPolicy;
 import org.elasticsearch.xpack.esql.plan.logical.Enrich;
 
-import java.util.Collection;
 import java.util.Map;
 
 /**
@@ -28,11 +27,6 @@ public ResolvedEnrichPolicy getResolvedPolicy(String policyName, Enrich.Mode mod
         return resolvedPolicies.get(new Key(policyName, mode));
     }
 
-    public Collection<ResolvedEnrichPolicy> resolvedEnrichPolicies() {
-        return resolvedPolicies.values();
-
-    }
-
     public String getError(String policyName, Enrich.Mode mode) {
         final String error = errors.get(new Key(policyName, mode));
         if (error != null) {
@@ -51,7 +45,5 @@ public void addError(String policyName, Enrich.Mode mode, String reason) {
         errors.putIfAbsent(new Key(policyName, mode), reason);
     }
 
-    private record Key(String policyName, Enrich.Mode mode) {
-
-    }
+    private record Key(String policyName, Enrich.Mode mode) {}
 }

x-pack/plugin/esql/src/main/java/org/elasticsearch/xpack/esql/enrich/EnrichPolicyResolver.java

@@ -59,6 +59,7 @@
 import java.util.Set;
 import java.util.stream.Collectors;
 
+import static java.util.stream.Collectors.toSet;
 import static org.elasticsearch.xpack.esql.expression.Foldables.stringLiteralValueOf;
 import static org.elasticsearch.xpack.esql.session.EsqlCCSUtils.markClusterWithFinalStateAndNoShards;
 
@@ -121,7 +122,7 @@ public void resolvePolicies(List<Enrich> enriches, EsqlExecutionInfo executionIn
         }
 
         doResolvePolicies(
-            new HashSet<>(executionInfo.getClusters().keySet()),
+            executionInfo.clusterInfo.isEmpty() ? new HashSet<>() : executionInfo.getRunningClusterAliases().collect(toSet()),
             enriches.stream().map(EnrichPolicyResolver.UnresolvedPolicy::from).toList(),
             executionInfo,
             listener
@@ -310,7 +311,7 @@ private void lookupPolicies(
             Set<String> remotePolicies = unresolvedPolicies.stream()
                 .filter(u -> u.mode != Enrich.Mode.COORDINATOR)
                 .map(u -> u.name)
-                .collect(Collectors.toSet());
+                .collect(toSet());
             // remote clusters
             if (remotePolicies.isEmpty() == false) {
                 for (String cluster : remoteClusters) {
@@ -342,7 +343,7 @@ public void onFailure(Exception e) {
             Set<String> localPolicies = unresolvedPolicies.stream()
                 .filter(u -> includeLocal || u.mode != Enrich.Mode.REMOTE)
                 .map(u -> u.name)
-                .collect(Collectors.toSet());
+                .collect(toSet());
             if (localPolicies.isEmpty() == false) {
                 transportService.sendRequest(
                     transportService.getLocalNode(),

x-pack/plugin/esql/src/main/java/org/elasticsearch/xpack/esql/session/EsqlSession.java

@@ -394,14 +394,27 @@ public void analyzedPlan(
         }
 
         var preAnalysis = preAnalyzer.preAnalyze(parsed);
+        var result = FieldNameUtils.resolveFieldNames(parsed, preAnalysis.enriches().isEmpty() == false);
+
         EsqlCCSUtils.initCrossClusterState(indicesExpressionGrouper, verifier.licenseState(), preAnalysis.indexPattern(), executionInfo);
 
-        SubscribableListener. //
-        <EnrichResolution>newForked(l -> enrichPolicyResolver.resolvePolicies(preAnalysis.enriches(), executionInfo, l))
-            .<PreAnalysisResult>andThenApply(enrichResolution -> FieldNameUtils.resolveFieldNames(parsed, enrichResolution))
-            .<PreAnalysisResult>andThen((l, r) -> resolveInferences(parsed, r, l))
-            .<PreAnalysisResult>andThen((l, r) -> preAnalyzeMainIndices(preAnalysis, executionInfo, r, requestFilter, l))
+        SubscribableListener.<PreAnalysisResult>newForked(l -> preAnalyzeMainIndices(preAnalysis, executionInfo, result, requestFilter, l))
+            .andThenApply(r -> {
+                if (r.indices.isValid()
+                    && executionInfo.isCrossClusterSearch()
+                    && executionInfo.getRunningClusterAliases().findAny().isEmpty()) {
+                    LOGGER.debug("No more clusters to search, ending analysis stage");
+                    throw new NoClustersToSearchException();
+                }
+                return r;
+            })
             .<PreAnalysisResult>andThen((l, r) -> preAnalyzeLookupIndices(preAnalysis.lookupIndices().iterator(), r, executionInfo, l))
+            .<PreAnalysisResult>andThen((l, r) -> {
+                enrichPolicyResolver.resolvePolicies(preAnalysis.enriches(), executionInfo, l.map(r::withEnrichResolution));
+            })
+            .<PreAnalysisResult>andThen((l, r) -> {
+                inferenceService.inferenceResolver().resolveInferenceIds(parsed, l.map(r::withInferenceResolution));
+            })
             .<LogicalPlan>andThen((l, r) -> analyzeWithRetry(parsed, requestFilter, preAnalysis, executionInfo, r, l))
             .addListener(logicalPlanListener);
     }
@@ -638,9 +651,7 @@ private void preAnalyzeMainIndices(
             if (indexExpressionToResolve.isEmpty()) {
                 // if this was a pure remote CCS request (no local indices) and all remotes are offline, return an empty IndexResolution
                 listener.onResponse(
-                    result.withIndexResolution(
-                        IndexResolution.valid(new EsIndex(preAnalysis.indexPattern().indexPattern(), Map.of(), Map.of()))
-                    )
+                    result.withIndices(IndexResolution.valid(new EsIndex(preAnalysis.indexPattern().indexPattern(), Map.of(), Map.of())))
                 );
             } else {
                 indexResolver.resolveAsMergedMapping(
@@ -657,14 +668,15 @@ private void preAnalyzeMainIndices(
                         default -> requestFilter;
                     },
                     preAnalysis.indexMode() == IndexMode.TIME_SERIES,
-                    listener.delegateFailure((l, indexResolution) -> {
-                        l.onResponse(result.withIndexResolution(indexResolution));
+                    listener.delegateFailureAndWrap((l, indexResolution) -> {
+                        EsqlCCSUtils.updateExecutionInfoWithUnavailableClusters(executionInfo, indexResolution.failures());
+                        l.onResponse(result.withIndices(indexResolution));
                     })
                 );
             }
         } else {
             // occurs when dealing with local relations (row a = 1)
-            listener.onResponse(result.withIndexResolution(IndexResolution.invalid("[none specified]")));
+            listener.onResponse(result.withIndices(IndexResolution.invalid("[none specified]")));
         }
     }
 
@@ -676,21 +688,8 @@ private void analyzeWithRetry(
         PreAnalysisResult result,
         ActionListener<LogicalPlan> listener
     ) {
-        if (result.indices.isValid()) {
-            EsqlCCSUtils.updateExecutionInfoWithUnavailableClusters(executionInfo, result.indices.failures());
-            if (executionInfo.isCrossClusterSearch()
-                && executionInfo.getClusterStates(EsqlExecutionInfo.Cluster.Status.RUNNING).findAny().isEmpty()) {
-                // for a CCS, if all clusters have been marked as SKIPPED, nothing to search so send a sentinel Exception
-                // to let the LogicalPlanActionListener decide how to proceed
-                LOGGER.debug("No more clusters to search, ending analysis stage");
-                listener.onFailure(new NoClustersToSearchException());
-                return;
-            }
-        }
-
         var description = requestFilter == null ? "the only attempt without filter" : "first attempt with filter";
         LOGGER.debug("Analyzing the plan ({})", description);
-
         try {
             if (result.indices.isValid() || requestFilter != null) {
                 // We won't run this check with no filter and no valid indices since this may lead to false positive - missing index report
@@ -715,7 +714,6 @@ private void analyzeWithRetry(
                     try {
                         // the order here is tricky - if the cluster has been filtered and later became unavailable,
                         // do we want to declare it successful or skipped? For now, unavailability takes precedence.
-                        EsqlCCSUtils.updateExecutionInfoWithUnavailableClusters(executionInfo, r.indices.failures());
                         EsqlCCSUtils.updateExecutionInfoWithClustersWithNoMatchingIndices(executionInfo, r.indices, false);
                         LogicalPlan plan = analyzedPlan(parsed, r, executionInfo);
                         LOGGER.debug("Analyzed plan (second attempt without filter):\n{}", plan);
@@ -730,10 +728,6 @@ private void analyzeWithRetry(
         }
     }
 
-    private void resolveInferences(LogicalPlan plan, PreAnalysisResult preAnalysisResult, ActionListener<PreAnalysisResult> l) {
-        inferenceService.inferenceResolver().resolveInferenceIds(plan, l.map(preAnalysisResult::withInferenceResolution));
-    }
-
     private PhysicalPlan logicalPlanToPhysicalPlan(LogicalPlan optimizedPlan, EsqlQueryRequest request) {
         PhysicalPlan physicalPlan = optimizedPhysicalPlan(optimizedPlan);
         physicalPlan = physicalPlan.transformUp(FragmentExec.class, f -> {
@@ -793,43 +787,33 @@ public PhysicalPlan optimizedPhysicalPlan(LogicalPlan optimizedPlan) {
     }
 
     public record PreAnalysisResult(
+        Set<String> fieldNames,
+        Set<String> wildcardJoinIndices,
         IndexResolution indices,
         Map<String, IndexResolution> lookupIndices,
         EnrichResolution enrichResolution,
-        Set<String> fieldNames,
-        Set<String> wildcardJoinIndices,
         InferenceResolution inferenceResolution
     ) {
 
-        public PreAnalysisResult(EnrichResolution enrichResolution, Set<String> fieldNames, Set<String> wildcardJoinIndices) {
-            this(null, new HashMap<>(), enrichResolution, fieldNames, wildcardJoinIndices, InferenceResolution.EMPTY);
+        public PreAnalysisResult(Set<String> fieldNames, Set<String> wildcardJoinIndices) {
+            this(fieldNames, wildcardJoinIndices, null, new HashMap<>(), null, InferenceResolution.EMPTY);
         }
 
-        PreAnalysisResult withInferenceResolution(InferenceResolution newInferenceResolution) {
-            return new PreAnalysisResult(
-                indices(),
-                lookupIndices(),
-                enrichResolution(),
-                fieldNames(),
-                wildcardJoinIndices(),
-                newInferenceResolution
-            );
+        PreAnalysisResult withIndices(IndexResolution indices) {
+            return new PreAnalysisResult(fieldNames, wildcardJoinIndices, indices, lookupIndices, enrichResolution, inferenceResolution);
         }
 
-        PreAnalysisResult withIndexResolution(IndexResolution newIndexResolution) {
-            return new PreAnalysisResult(
-                newIndexResolution,
-                lookupIndices(),
-                enrichResolution(),
-                fieldNames(),
-                wildcardJoinIndices(),
-                inferenceResolution()
-            );
+        PreAnalysisResult addLookupIndexResolution(String index, IndexResolution indexResolution) {
+            lookupIndices.put(index, indexResolution);
+            return this;
         }
 
-        PreAnalysisResult addLookupIndexResolution(String index, IndexResolution newIndexResolution) {
-            lookupIndices.put(index, newIndexResolution);
-            return this;
+        PreAnalysisResult withEnrichResolution(EnrichResolution enrichResolution) {
+            return new PreAnalysisResult(fieldNames, wildcardJoinIndices, indices, lookupIndices, enrichResolution, inferenceResolution);
+        }
+
+        PreAnalysisResult withInferenceResolution(InferenceResolution inferenceResolution) {
+            return new PreAnalysisResult(fieldNames, wildcardJoinIndices, indices, lookupIndices, enrichResolution, inferenceResolution);
         }
     }
 }

x-pack/plugin/esql/src/main/java/org/elasticsearch/xpack/esql/session/FieldNameUtils.java

@@ -8,7 +8,6 @@
 package org.elasticsearch.xpack.esql.session;
 
 import org.elasticsearch.common.regex.Regex;
-import org.elasticsearch.xpack.esql.analysis.EnrichResolution;
 import org.elasticsearch.xpack.esql.core.expression.Alias;
 import org.elasticsearch.xpack.esql.core.expression.Attribute;
 import org.elasticsearch.xpack.esql.core.expression.AttributeSet;
@@ -20,7 +19,6 @@
 import org.elasticsearch.xpack.esql.core.expression.UnresolvedAttribute;
 import org.elasticsearch.xpack.esql.core.expression.UnresolvedStar;
 import org.elasticsearch.xpack.esql.core.util.Holder;
-import org.elasticsearch.xpack.esql.enrich.ResolvedEnrichPolicy;
 import org.elasticsearch.xpack.esql.expression.UnresolvedNamePattern;
 import org.elasticsearch.xpack.esql.expression.function.UnresolvedFunction;
 import org.elasticsearch.xpack.esql.expression.function.grouping.TBucket;
@@ -52,21 +50,16 @@
 import java.util.Locale;
 import java.util.Set;
 import java.util.function.BiConsumer;
-import java.util.stream.Collectors;
+import java.util.stream.Stream;
 
+import static java.util.stream.Collectors.toSet;
 import static org.elasticsearch.xpack.esql.core.util.StringUtils.WILDCARD;
 
 public class FieldNameUtils {
 
     private static final Set<String> FUNCTIONS_REQUIRING_TIMESTAMP = Set.of(TBucket.NAME.toLowerCase(Locale.ROOT));
 
-    public static PreAnalysisResult resolveFieldNames(LogicalPlan parsed, EnrichResolution enrichResolution) {
-
-        // we need the match_fields names from enrich policies and THEN, with an updated list of fields, we call field_caps API
-        Set<String> enrichPolicyMatchFields = enrichResolution.resolvedEnrichPolicies()
-            .stream()
-            .map(ResolvedEnrichPolicy::matchField)
-            .collect(Collectors.toSet());
+    public static PreAnalysisResult resolveFieldNames(LogicalPlan parsed, boolean hasEnriches) {
 
         // get the field names from the parsed plan combined with the ENRICH match fields from the ENRICH policy
         List<LogicalPlan> inlinestats = parsed.collect(InlineStats.class::isInstance);
@@ -78,7 +71,7 @@ public static PreAnalysisResult resolveFieldNames(LogicalPlan parsed, EnrichReso
         if (false == parsed.anyMatch(p -> shouldCollectReferencedFields(p, inlinestatsAggs))) {
             // no explicit columns selection, for example "from employees"
             // also, inlinestats only adds columns to the existent output, its Aggregate shouldn't interfere with potentially using "*"
-            return new PreAnalysisResult(enrichResolution, IndexResolver.ALL_FIELDS, Set.of());
+            return new PreAnalysisResult(IndexResolver.ALL_FIELDS, Set.of());
         }
 
         Holder<Boolean> projectAll = new Holder<>(false);
@@ -90,7 +83,7 @@ public static PreAnalysisResult resolveFieldNames(LogicalPlan parsed, EnrichReso
         });
 
         if (projectAll.get()) {
-            return new PreAnalysisResult(enrichResolution, IndexResolver.ALL_FIELDS, Set.of());
+            return new PreAnalysisResult(IndexResolver.ALL_FIELDS, Set.of());
         }
 
         var referencesBuilder = new Holder<>(AttributeSet.builder());
@@ -232,7 +225,7 @@ public static PreAnalysisResult resolveFieldNames(LogicalPlan parsed, EnrichReso
         parsed.forEachDownMayReturnEarly(forEachDownProcessor.get());
 
         if (projectAll.get()) {
-            return new PreAnalysisResult(enrichResolution, IndexResolver.ALL_FIELDS, Set.of());
+            return new PreAnalysisResult(IndexResolver.ALL_FIELDS, Set.of());
         }
 
         // Add JOIN ON column references afterward to avoid Alias removal
@@ -244,17 +237,21 @@ public static PreAnalysisResult resolveFieldNames(LogicalPlan parsed, EnrichReso
         referencesBuilder.get().removeIf(a -> a instanceof MetadataAttribute || MetadataAttribute.isSupported(a.name()));
         Set<String> fieldNames = referencesBuilder.get().build().names();
 
-        if (fieldNames.isEmpty() && enrichPolicyMatchFields.isEmpty()) {
+        if (hasEnriches) {
+            // we do not know names of the enrich policy match fields beforehand. We need to resolve all fields in this case
+            return new PreAnalysisResult(IndexResolver.ALL_FIELDS, wildcardJoinIndices);
+        } else if (fieldNames.isEmpty()) {
             // there cannot be an empty list of fields, we'll ask the simplest and lightest one instead: _index
-            return new PreAnalysisResult(enrichResolution, IndexResolver.INDEX_METADATA_FIELD, wildcardJoinIndices);
+            return new PreAnalysisResult(IndexResolver.INDEX_METADATA_FIELD, wildcardJoinIndices);
         } else {
-            fieldNames.addAll(subfields(fieldNames));
-            fieldNames.addAll(enrichPolicyMatchFields);
-            fieldNames.addAll(subfields(enrichPolicyMatchFields));
-            return new PreAnalysisResult(enrichResolution, fieldNames, wildcardJoinIndices);
+            return new PreAnalysisResult(fieldNames.stream().flatMap(FieldNameUtils::withSubfields).collect(toSet()), wildcardJoinIndices);
         }
     }
 
+    private static Stream<String> withSubfields(String name) {
+        return name.endsWith(WILDCARD) ? Stream.of(name) : Stream.of(name, name + ".*");
+    }
+
     /**
      * Indicates whether the given plan gives an exact list of fields that we need to collect from field_caps.
      */
@@ -297,8 +294,4 @@ private static boolean matchByName(Attribute attr, String other, boolean skipIfP
         var name = attr.name();
         return isPattern ? Regex.simpleMatch(name, other) : name.equals(other);
     }
-
-    private static Set<String> subfields(Set<String> names) {
-        return names.stream().filter(name -> name.endsWith(WILDCARD) == false).map(name -> name + ".*").collect(Collectors.toSet());
-    }
 }