-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 25.6k
Document multi index query support for simplified retrievers #134980
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Conversation
🔍 Preview links for changed docs |
ℹ️ Important: Docs version tagging👋 Thanks for updating the docs! Just a friendly reminder that our docs are now cumulative. This means all 9.x versions are documented on the same page and published off of the main branch, instead of creating separate pages for each minor version. We use applies_to tags to mark version-specific features and changes. Expand for a quick overviewWhen to use applies_to tags:✅ At the page level to indicate which products/deployments the content applies to (mandatory) What NOT to do:❌ Don't remove or replace information that applies to an older version 🤔 Need help?
|
### Limitations | ||
|
||
- **Single index**: Multi-field queries currently work with single index searches only | ||
- **Single index**: Applies only to the 9.1 version: multi-field queries work with single index searches only. |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
these are the docs we added for the simplified retriever #130559
And this is the only mention I see of this limitation.
I wanted to see if I could use applies_to
here but I couldn't find an example where we use it when we remove a limitation.
cc @leemthompo
Co-authored-by: Liam Thompson <[email protected]>
Pinging @elastic/search-relevance (Team:Search - Relevance) |
Pinging @elastic/core-docs (Team:Docs) |
### Limitations | ||
|
||
- **Single index**: Multi-field queries currently work with single index searches only | ||
- **Single index**: Until 9.2, multi-field queries only work with single index searches. |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Looks good, I think the applies to syntax could be a bit heavy handed here but will defer to @leemthompo for best practices 😁
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
yeah applies_to doesn't work in every scenario :)
* upstream/main: (43 commits) Unmute testAckedIndexing to see if it still fails on main (elastic#134682) Silence time zone ID deprecation warning for JDK 25 due to log4j2 bug. (elastic#134719) Adding a getUnmodifiableSourceAndMetadata() method to IngestDocument (elastic#134816) Mark the create-index-from-source action as publicly available on Serverless (elastic#134953) ESQL: Rename command from INLINESTATS to INLINE STATS (elastic#134827) Document multi index query support for simplified retrievers (elastic#134980) [ML] Fix YAMl test to use correct query parameter type (elastic#134999) [Transform] Wait for PIT to close (elastic#134955) Add XPath to XmlUtils (elastic#134923) Fixing conditional processor mutability bugs (elastic#134936) [Transform] Lower loglevel of 3 transform-related error messages from ERROR to WARN (elastic#134985) Unmute pattern text tests. (elastic#134981) Integrate weights into simplified RRF retriever syntax (elastic#132680) Mute org.elasticsearch.xpack.esql.qa.mixed.MixedClusterEsqlSpecIT test {csv-spec:stats.CountDistinctWithConditions} elastic#134993 Update periodic java-ea build to test java 26 pre-release (elastic#134983) Mute org.elasticsearch.xpack.esql.ccq.MultiClusterSpecIT test {csv-spec:stats.CountDistinctWithConditions} elastic#134984 Fix and unmute testIndexSettingProviderPrivateSetting (elastic#134861) Add missing common cat params (elastic#134870) Support querying multiple indices with the simplified RRF retriever (elastic#134822) Allow including semantic field embeddings in _source (elastic#134717) ...
BASE=eb3bc2f2929209461802884ea01f77d3b3fcf96a HEAD=16aecaca5333692fff65a3d71818c0d6de287e37 Branch=main
BASE=eb3bc2f2929209461802884ea01f77d3b3fcf96a HEAD=16aecaca5333692fff65a3d71818c0d6de287e37 Branch=main
BASE=eb3bc2f2929209461802884ea01f77d3b3fcf96a HEAD=16aecaca5333692fff65a3d71818c0d6de287e37 Branch=main
BASE=eb3bc2f2929209461802884ea01f77d3b3fcf96a HEAD=16aecaca5333692fff65a3d71818c0d6de287e37 Branch=main
Also addressed a test change from #134822 (comment)
We removed the limitation for being to able a single index with the simplified RRF and linear retrievers in:
#133720
#134822
so we can remove this limitation from the documentation.