-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 25.6k
DFS search phase per shard duration APM metric #135652
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Merged
chrisparrinello
merged 5 commits into
elastic:main
from
chrisparrinello:dfs_shard_metrics
Sep 30, 2025
Merged
Changes from all commits
Commits
Show all changes
5 commits
Select commit
Hold shift + click to select a range
5fce894
Adds a per shard duration for the DFS search phase called es.search.s…
chrisparrinello e457482
Update docs/changelog/135652.yaml
chrisparrinello b7a53b0
Merge branch 'main' into dfs_shard_metrics
chrisparrinello 4241695
do not pull out search execution context for attributes
chrisparrinello 8af8182
Merge branch 'main' into dfs_shard_metrics
chrisparrinello File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
There are no files selected for viewing
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
| Original file line number | Diff line number | Diff line change |
|---|---|---|
| @@ -0,0 +1,5 @@ | ||
| pr: 135652 | ||
| summary: DFS search phase per shard duration APM metric | ||
| area: Search | ||
| type: enhancement | ||
| issues: [] |
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
can you check that the measurement make some sense? For instance, are they always greater than 0? Are they always lower than the total took time?
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Unfortunately, they're not always greater than zero because we convert nanoseconds to milliseconds before storing them in the histogram so if something took less than a millisecond, we record a zero. This definitely happens in the unit tests. I took a stab at checking against took time but that I means I need to pull apart all of the asserts to get the SearchResponse, for example:
where
assertMeasurementschecks to make sure the measurements are less than or equal to the took time from the response and we have the right number of measurements. Let me know if you want to take this approach and I'll modify all of the tests to make sure we're asserting valid measurements.About the nanoseconds getting converted to 0 milliseconds, one thought I had was to change the units from milliseconds to microseconds or nanoseconds but the issue is that the underlying OpenTelemetry implementation of the histogram buckets the measurements before reporting to the APM server and there is an upper bound to the buckets (something like 110k) so if you choose the wrong scale you lose precision for measurements greater than 110k. There is a way to control the bucketing but it is deep deep in the OpenTelemetry meter code.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Right, sorry, took time is at the coord level, it's not possible to get it here. I see! and thanks for the explanation about the rounding. And for checking further about precision. I think we are good here!