-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 25.6k
[ML] Skip dataframes when disabled #137220
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Open
prwhelan
wants to merge
5
commits into
elastic:main
Choose a base branch
from
prwhelan:ES-11896
base: main
Could not load branches
Branch not found: {{ refName }}
Loading
Could not load tags
Nothing to show
Loading
Are you sure you want to change the base?
Some commits from the old base branch may be removed from the timeline,
and old review comments may become outdated.
+42
−20
Open
Changes from all commits
Commits
Show all changes
5 commits
Select commit
Hold shift + click to select a range
1954435
[ML] Skip dataframes when disabled
prwhelan 79ca4c9
Update docs/changelog/137220.yaml
prwhelan 33802d4
Merge branch 'main' into ES-11896
prwhelan c07884f
Merge branch 'main' into ES-11896
prwhelan a646cf1
Merge branch 'main' into ES-11896
prwhelan File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
There are no files selected for viewing
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
| Original file line number | Diff line number | Diff line change |
|---|---|---|
| @@ -0,0 +1,5 @@ | ||
| pr: 137220 | ||
| summary: Skip dataframes when disabled | ||
| area: Machine Learning | ||
| type: bug | ||
| issues: [] |
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Would it be possible to add a unit test for the case where
areDataFrameAnalyticsEnabledis false and we don't expect to see the dataframe information in the table?There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Sure, but the existing functionality isn't tested so adding the tests for both true/false would take a few weeks of calendar time, which I assume is okay since this bug had been open for months. Alternatively, the linked integration test covers the false case whereas the existing integration tests cover the true case.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Can you not just basically copy this test case where
areDataFrameAnalyticsEnabledis true, switch it to false, then assert that we see__none__as thedata_frame.idvalue?There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
That boolean is used within
getDerivedDatawhich is called before the method that this code tests, which isbuildTable. The test only callsbuildTable, so we'd only be verifying that an absent list sets__none__which is a test we should have but isn't really relevant to this change (happy to add it, though)There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Aah, I see, thanks for clarifying. Yeah, no need to add that test in this PR, since it's basically unrelated.