Skip to content

Conversation

@elazarlachkar
Copy link
Contributor

@elazarlachkar elazarlachkar commented Sep 28, 2025

null

Summary by CodeRabbit

  • Chores
    • Updated an internal package dependency to a newer revision as part of routine maintenance.
    • No user-facing functionality, behavior, or configuration was changed.
    • Intended to keep dependencies current for ongoing compatibility and stability.
    • No action required from users; workflows should continue to operate as before.

@elazarlachkar elazarlachkar self-assigned this Sep 28, 2025
@linear
Copy link

linear bot commented Sep 28, 2025

@coderabbitai
Copy link

coderabbitai bot commented Sep 28, 2025

Walkthrough

Updates the dbt-data-reliability git dependency revision and corresponding lock metadata in two files within elementary/monitor/dbt_project. No functional or control-flow changes.

Changes

Cohort / File(s) Summary
DBT dependency revision update
elementary/monitor/dbt_project/packages.yml, elementary/monitor/dbt_project/package-lock.yml
Bump git revision of elementary-data/dbt-data-reliability from 0f59f9f... to 2265cff...; update lock sha1 from 0dde8f6... to 643cf31.... No other edits.

Estimated code review effort

🎯 1 (Trivial) | ⏱️ ~3 minutes

Possibly related PRs

Suggested reviewers

  • ofek1weiss
  • michael-myaskovsky

Poem

Hop hop! I tweak a tiny thread,
A commit hash nudged ahead.
No models moved, no macros spun—
Just pins aligned, and then I’m done.
In the burrow logs I gleam,
“Locked and loaded,” squeaks my beam. 🥕✨

Pre-merge checks and finishing touches

✅ Passed checks (3 passed)
Check name Status Explanation
Description Check ✅ Passed Check skipped - CodeRabbit’s high-level summary is enabled.
Title Check ✅ Passed The title succinctly identifies the primary change—updating a DBT package revision in the project configuration—and avoids generic or unrelated wording, giving clear context for reviewers scanning the history. Although there is a minor typo in “pacakge,” the phrasing remains specific to the metadata update rather than vague or misleading.
Docstring Coverage ✅ Passed No functions found in the changes. Docstring coverage check skipped.
✨ Finishing touches
🧪 Generate unit tests
  • Create PR with unit tests
  • Post copyable unit tests in a comment
  • Commit unit tests in branch ele-5095-dremio-duplication-in-synced-schema

📜 Recent review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI

Review profile: CHILL

Plan: Pro

Disabled knowledge base sources:

  • Linear integration is disabled by default for public repositories

You can enable these sources in your CodeRabbit configuration.

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between d7f7d9b and 620c703.

📒 Files selected for processing (2)
  • elementary/monitor/dbt_project/package-lock.yml (1 hunks)
  • elementary/monitor/dbt_project/packages.yml (1 hunks)
⏰ Context from checks skipped due to timeout of 90000ms. You can increase the timeout in your CodeRabbit configuration to a maximum of 15 minutes (900000ms). (2)
  • GitHub Check: test / test
  • GitHub Check: code-quality
🔇 Additional comments (1)
elementary/monitor/dbt_project/package-lock.yml (1)

5-6: Lock metadata matches the new revision
Thanks for refreshing both the revision and sha1_hash to 2265cff62f4514390d97db02dd862c197353aed2 / 643cf3145ac135c679505d2319a262eac54237bd so they stay in sync with packages.yml. Nothing else needed here.


Comment @coderabbitai help to get the list of available commands and usage tips.

@github-actions
Copy link
Contributor

👋 @elazarlachkar
Thank you for raising your pull request.
Please make sure to add tests and document all user-facing changes.
You can do this by editing the docs files in this pull request.

@elazarlachkar elazarlachkar merged commit c15c28f into master Sep 28, 2025
6 checks passed
@elazarlachkar elazarlachkar deleted the ele-5095-dremio-duplication-in-synced-schema branch September 28, 2025 15:57
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants