Consistently use links without arities in getting started first pages #13885
Conversation
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
josevalim
approved these changes
Oct 7, 2024
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
3 participants
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Draft for discussion following #13882.
In the first 4 pages of the getting starting guide, we don't really need the notion of arity, it first comes up in the Anonymous function guide.
As a first step, I tried to edit these pages to consistently use arity-less links, to see how it would look like.
If we prefer to keep some functions with arity, I could edit the PR to at least preserve new links that were not links at all, e.g.
rem.A next step could be to move the arity explanation to anonymous functions.