Skip to content

Conversation

@sabiwara
Copy link
Contributor

This discussion made me realize that today the doc for typespecs does not call out the fact this is the "old typesystem" and it doesn't represent the upcoming type system.

I can see how this might be confusing for people who haven't followed the type system discussions closely or are learning Elixir, and do not realize a) that these two are separate b) how they relate/differ

Screenshot 2025-01-15 at 9 05 56 Screenshot 2025-01-15 at 9 06 07

Feel free to modify the copy.

Comment on lines 3 to 5
Elixir is in the process of implementing its [own type system](./gradual-set-theoretic-types.md) based on set-theoretic types. Typespecs, which are described in the following document, are a distinct notation for declaring types and specifications based on Erlang.

Typespecs will be phased out as the set-theoretic type effort moves forward.
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Suggested change
Elixir is in the process of implementing its [own type system](./gradual-set-theoretic-types.md) based on set-theoretic types. Typespecs, which are described in the following document, are a distinct notation for declaring types and specifications based on Erlang.
Typespecs will be phased out as the set-theoretic type effort moves forward.
> Elixir is in the process of implementing its [own type system](./gradual-set-theoretic-types.md) based on set-theoretic types. Typespecs, which are described in the following document, are a distinct notation for declaring types and specifications based on Erlang. Typespecs may be phased out as the set-theoretic type effort moves forward.

@josevalim
Copy link
Member

Feel free to merge and, once you do, please backport!

@sabiwara sabiwara merged commit c592252 into elixir-lang:main Jan 15, 2025
1 check passed
@sabiwara sabiwara deleted the doc-types branch January 15, 2025 11:41
sabiwara added a commit to sabiwara/elixir that referenced this pull request Jan 15, 2025
@sabiwara
Copy link
Contributor Author

once you do, please backport!

Done ✅

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants