Improve SBoM Details #14258
Merged
Improve SBoM Details #14258
Conversation
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
josevalim
reviewed
Feb 8, 2025
maennchen
force-pushed
the
jm/improve_sbom_details
branch
from
abc0d9e to
2a7c850
Compare
|
There's a small issue with the rules. Debugging... |
maennchen
force-pushed
the
jm/improve_sbom_details
branch
from
2a7c850 to
2797d33
Compare
maennchen
force-pushed
the
jm/improve_sbom_details
branch
from
2797d33 to
93ede06
Compare
|
@maennchen just confirm, is this good to go? |
|
@josevalim Yes, now it is. There was an issue around gitignore files. I’ll adress those upstream. (Not sure yet if it is an ORT or ScanCode Issue.) |
|
💚 💙 💜 💛 ❤️ |
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
2 participants
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Follow up of #14241
Unmanagedpackage manager withSpdxDocumentFileto improve fields likenameandhomepagein SPDXSome more changes will need to be done in the future about declaring the erlang dependency and publish the correct purls, but that currently has an issue. (oss-review-toolkit/ort#9904) I'll open a PR about that once there's a working solution.