Skip to content

Unify :empty_list and :list domains in maps #14955

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Open
wants to merge 3 commits into
base: main
Choose a base branch
from
+26 −2
Open

Unify :empty_list and :list domains in maps #14955

Show file tree
Hide file tree
Changes from 1 commit
Commits
Show all changes
3 commits
Select commit Hold shift + click to select a range
3caa8ba
Unify :empty_list and :list domains in maps
gldubc Nov 24, 2025
3f8881f
Add test for domain instantiation
gldubc Nov 24, 2025
47b58b2
Formatting
gldubc Nov 24, 2025
File filter

Filter by extension

Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
3 changes: 1 addition & 2 deletions lib/elixir/lib/module/types/descr.ex
View file
Open in desktop
Original file line number Diff line number Diff line change
Expand Up @@ -32,7 +32,6 @@ defmodule Module.Types.Descr do

@domain_key_types [
{:domain_key, :binary},
{:domain_key, :empty_list},
{:domain_key, :integer},
{:domain_key, :float},
{:domain_key, :pid},
Expand Down Expand Up @@ -3031,7 +3030,7 @@ defmodule Module.Types.Descr do
defp bitmap_to_domain_keys(bitmap) do
[
if((bitmap &&& @bit_binary) != 0, do: domain_key(:binary)),
if((bitmap &&& @bit_empty_list) != 0, do: domain_key(:empty_list)),
if((bitmap &&& @bit_empty_list) != 0, do: domain_key(:list)),
Copy link
Member

@josevalim josevalim Nov 24, 2025

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Now we can include :list twice. I think we need to handle that a bit upstream. :S

Copy link
Member Author

@gldubc gldubc Nov 24, 2025

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I believe this gets handled gracefully thanks to

  # TODO: Double check if we indeed want the union here
  # when we start using domain types from Elixir itself
  defp map_put_domain(domain, key, value) do
    Map.update(domain, key, if_set(value), &union(&1, value))
  end

So when we instantiate say, empty_list() to integer() and non_empty_list() to atom() from Elixir, this will be split into two pairs of bindings passed to the constructor closed_map or open_map, with twice the same key domain_key(:list). Then, the map will have :list bound to integer() or atom(). I just added a test for that. A typing test would be nice too perhaps.

if((bitmap &&& @bit_integer) != 0, do: domain_key(:integer)),
if((bitmap &&& @bit_float) != 0, do: domain_key(:float)),
if((bitmap &&& @bit_pid) != 0, do: domain_key(:pid)),
Expand Down
12 changes: 12 additions & 0 deletions lib/elixir/test/elixir/module/types/descr_test.exs
View file
Open in desktop
Original file line number Diff line number Diff line change
Expand Up @@ -1702,6 +1702,18 @@ defmodule Module.Types.DescrTest do
t2 = closed_map([{domain_key(:tuple), float()}])
t3 = union(t1, t2)
assert map_get(t3, tuple()) == {:ok, number() |> nil_or_type()}

# Verify that empty_list() bitmap type maps to :list domain (not :empty_list domain)
map_with_list_domain = closed_map([{domain_key(:list), atom([:empty])}])

# empty_list() should access the :list domain
assert map_get(map_with_list_domain, empty_list()) == {:ok, atom([:empty]) |> nil_or_type()}

# non_empty_list() should also access the :list domain
assert map_get(map_with_list_domain, non_empty_list(integer())) == {:ok, atom([:empty]) |> nil_or_type()}

# list() should also access the :list domain
assert map_get(map_with_list_domain, list(integer())) == {:ok, atom([:empty]) |> nil_or_type()}
end

test "map_get with dynamic" do
Expand Down
Loading