Skip to content

Conversation

@sidorko
Copy link

@sidorko sidorko commented Nov 29, 2025

or add an understandable use instead

Summary by CodeRabbit

  • Refactor
    • Enhanced TypeScript type definitions with improved generic flexibility and removed deprecation notices for better developer experience.

✏️ Tip: You can customize this high-level summary in your review settings.

@coderabbitai
Copy link
Contributor

coderabbitai bot commented Nov 29, 2025

Walkthrough

Type signatures for InferContext and InferHandler in src/types.ts were expanded to accept an additional generic parameter Schema with a default value of RouteSchema. Deprecation comments above both types were removed. No runtime behavior changes.

Changes

Cohort / File(s) Summary
Type signature expansion
src/types.ts
Added generic parameter Schema with default RouteSchema to InferContext and InferHandler types; removed deprecation comments

Estimated code review effort

🎯 1 (Trivial) | ⏱️ ~5 minutes

  • Type signature changes are backwards-compatible due to default parameter values
  • Single file modification with straightforward, repetitive edits
  • No logic or runtime behavior alterations

Poem

A rabbit hops with joy today,
Types now flex in a newer way!
Schemas flow where deprecation once stood,
Generic bounds understood—life is good! 🐰✨

Pre-merge checks and finishing touches

❌ Failed checks (1 inconclusive)
Check name Status Explanation Resolution
Title check ❓ Inconclusive The title 'remove the weird deprecated' is vague and doesn't clearly convey what was actually changed; it lacks specificity about the concrete modifications to the type signatures. Improve the title to be more specific, such as 'Expand InferContext and InferHandler type signatures with generic parameter' or 'Remove deprecation comments and extend generic parameters for types'.
✅ Passed checks (2 passed)
Check name Status Explanation
Description Check ✅ Passed Check skipped - CodeRabbit’s high-level summary is enabled.
Docstring Coverage ✅ Passed No functions found in the changed files to evaluate docstring coverage. Skipping docstring coverage check.
✨ Finishing touches
  • 📝 Generate docstrings
🧪 Generate unit tests (beta)
  • Create PR with unit tests
  • Post copyable unit tests in a comment

📜 Recent review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI

Review profile: CHILL

Plan: Pro

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between 3ad795b and d32f18f.

📒 Files selected for processing (1)
  • src/types.ts (0 hunks)
💤 Files with no reviewable changes (1)
  • src/types.ts

Tip

📝 Customizable high-level summaries are now available in beta!

You can now customize how CodeRabbit generates the high-level summary in your pull requests — including its content, structure, tone, and formatting.

  • Provide your own instructions using the high_level_summary_instructions setting.
  • Format the summary however you like (bullet lists, tables, multi-section layouts, contributor stats, etc.).
  • Use high_level_summary_in_walkthrough to move the summary from the description to the walkthrough section.

Example instruction:

"Divide the high-level summary into five sections:

  1. 📝 Description — Summarize the main change in 50–60 words, explaining what was done.
  2. 📓 References — List relevant issues, discussions, documentation, or related PRs.
  3. 📦 Dependencies & Requirements — Mention any new/updated dependencies, environment variable changes, or configuration updates.
  4. 📊 Contributor Summary — Include a Markdown table showing contributions:
    | Contributor | Lines Added | Lines Removed | Files Changed |
  5. ✔️ Additional Notes — Add any extra reviewer context.
    Keep each section concise (under 200 words) and use bullet or numbered lists for clarity."

Note: This feature is currently in beta for Pro-tier users, and pricing will be announced later.


Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out.

❤️ Share

Comment @coderabbitai help to get the list of available commands and usage tips.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant