Markdown update

[alicjakujawa]

Why is this pull-request needed?

Provided default value to Markdown component

Main changes

Provided default value to Markdown component

Summary by CodeRabbit

• Bug Fixes

  • The markdown component now properly handles default values when no explicit value is provided, ensuring smooth initialization.

• Tests

  • Added test coverage to verify the markdown component functions correctly when initialized without an explicit value.

[coderabbitai]

No actionable comments were generated in the recent review. 🎉

ℹ️ Recent review info

⚙️ Run configuration

Configuration used: Organization UI

Review profile: CHILL

Plan: Pro

Run ID: 0b126575-42af-4348-982f-a13f48c36698

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between 023a355 and 546222e.

⛔ Files ignored due to path filters (1)

• package-lock.json is excluded by !**/package-lock.json

📒 Files selected for processing (3)

• .changeset/few-worlds-behave.md
• src/editors/MarkdownEditor/index.test.tsx
• src/editors/MarkdownEditor/index.tsx

---

Walkthrough

Introduces an optional value prop for the MarkdownInput component with a default empty string fallback, includes a test case validating the component's behavior when value is undefined, and documents the change in a patch release changeset.

Changes

Cohort / File(s)	Summary
Changeset .changeset/few-worlds-behave.md	Patch release documentation for default value behavior in markdown component.
MarkdownEditor Component src/editors/MarkdownEditor/index.tsx, src/editors/MarkdownEditor/index.test.tsx	Made value prop optional (value?: string) and added fallback to empty string when undefined. Added test case verifying onChange fires correctly when component initializes with undefined value.

Estimated code review effort

🎯 2 (Simple) | ⏱️ ~8 minutes

🚥 Pre-merge checks | ✅ 1 | ❌ 2

❌ Failed checks (1 warning, 1 inconclusive)

Check name	Status	Explanation	Resolution
Description check	⚠️ Warning	The description is incomplete, missing the required 'Test evidence' section and lacks specific details about the implementation.	Add the 'Test evidence' section documenting how the changes were tested, and provide more specific details about what default value was added and how it works.
Title check	❓ Inconclusive	The title is vague and generic, using non-descriptive language ('update') that doesn't clearly convey the specific change being made.	Consider a more specific title like 'Make MarkdownInput value prop optional with default' to better reflect the actual change.

✅ Passed checks (1 passed)

Check name	Status	Explanation
Docstring Coverage	✅ Passed	No functions found in the changed files to evaluate docstring coverage. Skipping docstring coverage check.

_{✏️ Tip: You can configure your own custom pre-merge checks in the settings.}

✨ Finishing Touches

• 📝 Generate docstrings (stacked PR)
• 📝 Generate docstrings (commit on current branch)

🧪 Generate unit tests (beta)

• Create PR with unit tests
• Post copyable unit tests in a comment
• Commit unit tests in branch markdown-update

📝 Coding Plan for PR comments

• Generate coding plan

---

Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out.

❤️ Share

• X
• Mastodon
• Reddit
• LinkedIn

_{Comment @coderabbitai help to get the list of available commands and usage tips.}

[sonarqubecloud]

Quality Gate passed

Issues
0 New issues
0 Accepted issues

Measures
0 Security Hotspots
100.0% Coverage on New Code
0.0% Duplication on New Code

See analysis details on SonarQube Cloud

[mad-raccoon]

const MarkdownInput: FC<MarkdownInputProps> = ({ value = '', onChange }) => {
  return <MarkdownEditor value={value} onChange={onChange} />;
};

This removes the need for value ?? '' in JSX and keeps the fallback logic closer to the prop definition, improving readability.

In what cases will the value become undefined? I plan this component to receive a string always to avoid this kind of situations