Skip to content

JOSS review #57

@seabbs

Description

@seabbs

As the codebase matures (thanks to all contributors so far!) it might make sense to start thinking about having it peer-reviewed (this is linked to #56 ). I have had great experiences with JOSS so this would be my first thought.

Metadata

Metadata

Labels

questionFurther information is requested

Type

No type

Projects

No projects

Milestone

No milestone

Relationships

None yet

Development

No branches or pull requests

Issue actions