Sliding caisson and oscillating cylinder tests added and some other corrections#167
Sliding caisson and oscillating cylinder tests added and some other corrections#167Pedrohrw wants to merge 4 commits intoerdc:masterfrom
Conversation
Pom awvv tests
Change in the chdir path
change in air-water-vv travis file, from erdc-cm to erdc
| levelNonlinearSolver = NonlinearSolvers.Newton | ||
|
|
||
| nonlinearSmoother = NonlinearSolvers.GaussSeidel | ||
| nonlinearSmoother = NonlinearSolvers.NLGaussSeidel |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
@Pedrohrw, I guess this change give you better results, does it?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
@Giovanni-Cozzuto-1989, actually I didn't compare it with the previous one. I just updated it to the new code. Should I check with the previous one?
| Sliding caisson breakwater | ||
| ========================== | ||
|
|
||
| Here is a modelling of the dynamic response of a vertically composite caisson |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
I would write something like:
This test problem comprises the modelling of a vertically composite caisson breakwater and the assessment of its dynamic response when subject to breaking wave loads. These may cause permanent displacements of the superstructure from its resting position.
|
|
||
| Here is a modelling of the dynamic response of a vertically composite caisson | ||
| breakwater subject to breaking wave loads that are able to permanently displace it from its resting position. | ||
| The test case aims to assess the ability of Proteus to model motion response of the superstructure to wave |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
...the capability...
| Here is a modelling of the dynamic response of a vertically composite caisson | ||
| breakwater subject to breaking wave loads that are able to permanently displace it from its resting position. | ||
| The test case aims to assess the ability of Proteus to model motion response of the superstructure to wave | ||
| loadings. Sliding and overturning of the caisson superstructure were modelled and its dynamic response |
|
|
||
| * Caisson length equal to 0.300 m, height equal to 0.385 m, width equal to 0.400 m and mass equal to 64.8 kg. | ||
| * Rubble mound length equal to 0.785 m, height equal to 0.175 m, seaward and shoreward slopes equal to | ||
| 1/3 and 1/2, respectively, n=0.4 , d50=0.050m and d15=d50/1.2; |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
porosity=0.4 rather than n
| @@ -0,0 +1,775 @@ | |||
| from proteus import Domain, Context | |||
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Before pushing it, did you change anything? It looks like the latest version I used by the way. Good.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
I just changed about "setSprings" and "setabsorptiozones" in tank.py because as you can remember there was a little error. No more than this.
| involved in coupling highly turbulent flows with the pipeline motion. The experimental data used are whose found | ||
| in Fu et al., (2014) | ||
|
|
||
| According this experimental configuration, a cylinder with diameter D=0.25 was placed in a 196 m long, 10m wide |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
According with the...
| kappa_model = 5 | ||
| # | ||
| dissipation_model_flag = 1 | ||
| if useRANS == 2: |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
if useRANS >= 2:
| dissipation_model = 6 | ||
| # | ||
| dissipation_model_flag = 1 | ||
| if ct.useRANS == 2: |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
if ct.useRANS >= 2:
| dissipationInflow = dissipationInflow2 | ||
| else: | ||
| dissipationInflow = (kInflow**0.5) / (opts.scaleLength*opts.water_level) | ||
|
|
There was a problem hiding this comment.
This version uses a skin friction formula for imposing the turbulence at the pipeline.
We need to do the same test with the wall function as well!
Pom awvv tests
2 participants
Tests for the sliding caisson and oscillating cylinder cases have been added. Some corrections have been made to get a proper performace.