Open
Conversation
Owner
|
I haven't forgotten about this. Day job has kept me busy. I suspect there are more meaningful concepts to be found here, I just haven't had time to sit down with the algorithm to confirm. |
Contributor
Author
|
I certainly understand. I'm sure there is a better concept hidden inside, but I wanted to push the changes before madness started (I moved countries and started a new job in the meanwhile :) ) |
|
It would be great if this feature is merged |
Owner
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
3 participants
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Concept is still the same (based on the Standard) - there's no clear analogy for semigroup when the accumulator type is different from value type.