[waveshare_epaper] Add compatible display type/board manufacturer #5172
Conversation
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
As previously trying to get it running with other types (after switching from one which was compatible with 4.20in def), a clarification on what display is used, is helpful and speeds up the tinkering. Seems to be a common board.
✅ Deploy Preview for esphome ready!
To edit notification comments on pull requests, go to your Netlify project configuration. |
WalkthroughThis change updates the documentation for the Waveshare E-Paper display component by modifying the description of the Changes
Estimated code review effort🎯 1 (Trivial) | ⏱️ ~2 minutes Possibly related PRs
Suggested labels
Suggested reviewers
Note ⚡️ Unit Test Generation is now available in beta!Learn more here, or try it out under "Finishing Touches" below. ✨ Finishing Touches🧪 Generate unit tests
Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out. 🪧 TipsChatThere are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:
SupportNeed help? Create a ticket on our support page for assistance with any issues or questions. Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments. CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)
Other keywords and placeholders
CodeRabbit Configuration File (
|
![coderabbitai[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/347564?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 0
🧹 Nitpick comments (1)
components/display/waveshare_epaper.rst (1)
129-129: Minor wording tweak for consistency
Adding the word “variant” keeps the pattern used elsewhere in the list (e.g. “display with … sticker”) and makes it explicit that WeAct 4.2" is a specific board variant rather than part of the product name.- - ``gdey042t81`` - GoodDisplay GDEY042T81 4.2" B/W (WeAct 4.2") + - ``gdey042t81`` - GoodDisplay GDEY042T81 4.2" B/W (WeAct 4.2" variant)
📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro
📒 Files selected for processing (1)
components/display/waveshare_epaper.rst(1 hunks)
🧰 Additional context used
📓 Path-based instructions (1)
**
⚙️ CodeRabbit Configuration File
- Do not generate or add any sequence diagrams
Files:
components/display/waveshare_epaper.rst
🧠 Learnings (1)
📓 Common learnings
Learnt from: jesserockz
PR: esphome/esphome-docs#4865
File: .github/workflows/needs-docs.yml:0-0
Timestamp: 2025-05-01T03:29:47.922Z
Learning: In the esphome-docs repository, the "current" label is automatically added by a bot to pull requests, making it a reliable indicator for the target branch.
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Description:
As previously trying to get it running with other types (after switching from one which was compatible with 4.20in def), a clarification on what display is used, is helpful and speeds up the tinkering. Seems to be a common board.
Checklist:
I am merging into
nextbecause this is new documentation that has a matching pull-request in esphome as linked above.or
I am merging into
currentbecause this is a fix, change and/or adjustment in the current documentation and is not for a new component or feature.Link added in
/components/index.rstwhen creating new documents for new components or cookbook.