Skip to content

Add Support for Twin AIoT Board #11717

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Closed
wants to merge 5 commits into from
Closed

Conversation

bekirr12
Copy link

Description of Change
This pull request adds support for the Twin AIoT board to the Arduino-ESP32 core. As a product developed by our company, "Twin Science", we aim to make it easily accessible and usable for all our users directly within the Arduino IDE.

The Twin AIoT is a development board based on the ESP32-S3-MINI-1 chip. It features led matrix, touchpad, rgb led, analog and digital pins. The board's pin definitions and configuration have been carefully prepared and tested.

Tests scenarios
I have tested this pull request on my Twin AIoT board.

The tests were performed using the Arduino IDE 2.3.6.

The following scenarios were tested successfully:

Basic Functionality: The classic "Blink", "Serial Monitor", "RGB Led", "Led Matrix" examples worked as expected, confirming core functionality and proper board selection.

GPIOs: A series of digital and analog I/O tests were performed to verify the correctness of the pinout definitions.

Connectivity: Wi-Fi and Bluetooth examples were run successfully to confirm wireless connectivity.

@bekirr12 bekirr12 requested a review from P-R-O-C-H-Y as a code owner August 12, 2025 11:17
@CLAassistant
Copy link

CLAassistant commented Aug 12, 2025

CLA assistant check
All committers have signed the CLA.

Copy link
Contributor

github-actions bot commented Aug 12, 2025

Warnings
⚠️

Some issues found for the commit messages in this PR:

  • the commit message "Update Pins_Arduino.h":
    • summary looks empty
    • type/action looks empty
  • the commit message "fix(variants/Pins_Arduino.h): Correct pin assignments and remove macro conflict":
    • scope/component should be lowercase without whitespace, allowed special characters are _ / . , * - .

Please fix these commit messages - here are some basic tips:

  • follow Conventional Commits style
  • correct format of commit message should be: <type/action>(<scope/component>): <summary>, for example fix(esp32): Fixed startup timeout issue
  • allowed types are: change,ci,docs,feat,fix,refactor,remove,revert,test
  • sufficiently descriptive message summary should be between 10 to 72 characters and start with upper case letter
  • avoid Jira references in commit messages (unavailable/irrelevant for our customers)

TIP: Install pre-commit hooks and run this check when committing (uses the Conventional Precommit Linter).

👋 Hello bekirr12, we appreciate your contribution to this project!


📘 Please review the project's Contributions Guide for key guidelines on code, documentation, testing, and more.

🖊️ Please also make sure you have read and signed the Contributor License Agreement for this project.

Click to see more instructions ...


This automated output is generated by the PR linter DangerJS, which checks if your Pull Request meets the project's requirements and helps you fix potential issues.

DangerJS is triggered with each push event to a Pull Request and modify the contents of this comment.

Please consider the following:
- Danger mainly focuses on the PR structure and formatting and can't understand the meaning behind your code or changes.
- Danger is not a substitute for human code reviews; it's still important to request a code review from your colleagues.
- Resolve all warnings (⚠️ ) before requesting a review from human reviewers - they will appreciate it.
- To manually retry these Danger checks, please navigate to the Actions tab and re-run last Danger workflow.

Review and merge process you can expect ...


We do welcome contributions in the form of bug reports, feature requests and pull requests.

1. An internal issue has been created for the PR, we assign it to the relevant engineer.
2. They review the PR and either approve it or ask you for changes or clarifications.
3. Once the GitHub PR is approved we do the final review, collect approvals from core owners and make sure all the automated tests are passing.
- At this point we may do some adjustments to the proposed change, or extend it by adding tests or documentation.
4. If the change is approved and passes the tests it is merged into the default branch.

Generated by 🚫 dangerJS against 90e119e

@bekirr12 bekirr12 closed this Aug 12, 2025
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants