Skip to content

Conversation

@msimberg
Copy link
Collaborator

@msimberg msimberg commented Jul 7, 2025

No description provided.

@msimberg msimberg requested review from RMeli and bcumming as code owners July 7, 2025 12:33
@github-actions
Copy link

github-actions bot commented Jul 7, 2025

preview available: https://docs.tds.cscs.ch/186

@github-actions
Copy link

github-actions bot commented Jul 8, 2025

preview available: https://docs.tds.cscs.ch/186

@github-actions

This comment has been minimized.

1 similar comment
@github-actions
Copy link

github-actions bot commented Jul 8, 2025

@check-spelling-bot Report

🔴 Please review

See the 📂 files view, the 📜action log, or 📝 job summary for details.

Unrecognized words (12)
assinged
assings
Epyc
fontawesome
gpu
gpus
NUMA
octicons
Prioritization
resouces
ROCM
runtimes
To accept these unrecognized words as correct and remove the previously acknowledged and now absent words, you could run the following commands

... in a clone of the [email protected]:msimberg/cscs-docs.git repository
on the nomultithread-fix-typo branch (ℹ️ how do I use this?):

curl -s -S -L 'https://raw.githubusercontent.com/check-spelling/check-spelling/2d5f9dd9d2d43584d36e4ae03a3508eff411eda9/apply.pl' |
perl - 'https://github.com/eth-cscs/cscs-docs/actions/runs/16147231719/attempts/1' &&
git commit -m 'Update check-spelling metadata'
Available 📚 dictionaries could cover words not in the 📘 dictionary
Dictionary Entries Covers Uniquely
cspell:aws/aws.txt 218 1 1

Consider adding them (in .github/workflows/spelling.yaml) in jobs:/spelling: for uses: check-spelling/check-spelling@2d5f9dd9d2d43584d36e4ae03a3508eff411eda9 in its with to extra_dictionaries:

          cspell:aws/aws.txt

ℹ️ Because this workflow is running on: pull_request_target, changes to this workflow file will not take effect as part of a pull request (including this one). You should:

  1. Create a new branch.
  2. Add dictionaries to the workflow file (.github/workflows/spelling.yaml) on that branch.
  3. Test them by pushing that branch.
  4. Do not remove entries from expect files on that branch because the workflow changes that will eventually provide the dictionary coverage won't be applicable to the workflow in the corresponding pull request (they are only available after they're merged to the branch).
  5. Once that branch is merged, you can remove the entries that are no longer needed in another branch.

To stop checking additional dictionaries, add (in .github/workflows/spelling.yaml) for uses: check-spelling/check-spelling@2d5f9dd9d2d43584d36e4ae03a3508eff411eda9 in its with:

check_extra_dictionaries: ""
Warnings ⚠️ (1)

See the 📂 files view, the 📜action log, or 📝 job summary for details.

⚠️ Warnings Count
⚠️ non-alpha-in-dictionary 1

See ⚠️ Event descriptions for more information.

@bcumming bcumming added this pull request to the merge queue Jul 8, 2025
Merged via the queue into eth-cscs:main with commit 7fc845c Jul 8, 2025
2 of 3 checks passed
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants