Make wordings clearer for self build payload signature verification#5002
Merged
jtraglia merged 4 commits intoethereum:masterfrom Mar 13, 2026
Merged
Conversation
…payloads The gossip validation rule for `signed_execution_payload_envelope.signature` only mentioned verifying against the builder's public key. For self-built payloads (`BUILDER_INDEX_SELF_BUILD`), the signature is verified against the proposer's public key instead. Clarify this and reference `verify_execution_payload_envelope_signature`. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.6 <noreply@anthropic.com>
jtraglia
approved these changes
Mar 13, 2026
auto-merge was automatically disabled
March 13, 2026 07:10
Head branch was pushed to by a user without write access
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
2 participants
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Currently wordings for signature verification for p2p
execution_payloadmakes sense for non self-build scenario but is confusing for self-build scenario.Update wordings such that the rule works for both.