Skip to content
This repository was archived by the owner on Jul 1, 2021. It is now read-only.

Conversation

veox
Copy link
Contributor

@veox veox commented Jan 7, 2019

What was wrong?

Fallout from PR ethereum/py-evm#1577 (comment).

Closes #102.

CI jobs have eip150, eip158 in their names.

One has to know the numbers refer to hard-forks to understand jobs don't check for kitty support, or the like.

How was it fixed?

Renamed CI job name (label only).

(Or was the original request to rename it throughout the codebase?..)

Cute Animal Picture

put a cute animal picture link inside the parentheses

Source: thumbnail of a video on framepool

@veox veox changed the title CI: rename EIP15{0,8} tox jobs to their long-form fork names. [WIP] CI: rename EIP15{0,8} tox jobs to their long-form fork names. Jan 7, 2019
Everywhere else in the codebase, EIP15{0,8} remain.
@veox veox force-pushed the rename-eipxxx-ci-jobs branch from eb3217b to 48aaab2 Compare January 7, 2019 14:49
@veox veox changed the title [WIP] CI: rename EIP15{0,8} tox jobs to their long-form fork names. CI: rename EIP15{0,8} tox jobs to their long-form fork names. Jan 7, 2019
@cburgdorf cburgdorf merged commit ff96e96 into ethereum:master Jan 7, 2019
@veox veox deleted the rename-eipxxx-ci-jobs branch May 21, 2019 12:07
Sign up for free to subscribe to this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in.

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

Rename the EIPXXX test jobs to their long form fork names

2 participants