Skip to content

Conversation

@auricom
Copy link
Collaborator

@auricom auricom commented Oct 30, 2025

Overview

@gemini-code-assist
Copy link

Summary of Changes

Hello @auricom, I'm Gemini Code Assist1! I'm currently reviewing this pull request and will post my feedback shortly. In the meantime, here's a summary to help you and other reviewers quickly get up to speed!

This pull request significantly enhances the monitoring capabilities for JSON-RPC endpoints by introducing a dedicated metric for tracking endpoint availability and refining the existing request duration metrics. These changes provide more granular insights into the health and performance of connected EVM nodes, allowing for better operational visibility and faster detection of potential issues.

Highlights

  • Endpoint Availability Monitoring: Introduced a new endpoint_availability metric to track the reachability status of JSON-RPC endpoints, providing clear visibility into their operational state.
  • Enhanced RPC Duration Metrics: Replaced the static JsonRpcRequestSloSeconds gauge with a more dynamic JsonRpcRequestDurationSummary metric, which offers percentile-based duration tracking over a rolling window for JSON-RPC requests.
  • RPC URL Exposure: Added a GetRPCURL method to the EVM client, enabling monitoring functions to retrieve and use the specific RPC URL when recording endpoint availability.
  • Tooling Configuration: A new mise.toml file was added to configure the mise tool (formerly rtx) to specify the latest Go version for development environments.
Using Gemini Code Assist

The full guide for Gemini Code Assist can be found on our documentation page, here are some quick tips.

Invoking Gemini

You can request assistance from Gemini at any point by creating a comment using either /gemini <command> or @gemini-code-assist <command>. Below is a summary of the supported commands on the current page.

Feature Command Description
Code Review /gemini review Performs a code review for the current pull request in its current state.
Pull Request Summary /gemini summary Provides a summary of the current pull request in its current state.
Comment @gemini-code-assist Responds in comments when explicitly tagged, both in pull request comments and review comments.
Help /gemini help Displays a list of available commands.

Customization

To customize Gemini Code Assist for GitHub experience, repository maintainers can create a configuration file and/or provide a custom code review style guide (such as PEP-8 for Python) by creating and adding files to a .gemini/ folder in the base of the repository. Detailed instructions can be found here.

Limitations & Feedback

Gemini Code Assist may make mistakes. Please leave feedback on any instances where its feedback is incorrect or counter productive. You can react with 👍 and 👎 on @gemini-code-assist comments. If you're interested in giving your feedback about your experience with Gemini Code Assist for Github and other Google products, sign up here.

You can also get AI-powered code generation, chat, as well as code reviews directly in the IDE at no cost with the Gemini Code Assist IDE Extension.

Footnotes

  1. Review the Privacy Notices, Generative AI Prohibited Use Policy, Terms of Service, and learn how to configure Gemini Code Assist in GitHub here. Gemini can make mistakes, so double check it and use code with caution.

Copy link

@gemini-code-assist gemini-code-assist bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Code Review

This pull request introduces metrics for endpoint availability and improves JSON-RPC request duration monitoring by using a summary for percentile tracking instead of a static SLO gauge. The changes are logical and well-implemented. I've provided two suggestions for improvement: one to enhance build reproducibility by pinning the Go version in mise.toml, and another to refactor a small piece of code in internal/jsonrpc/monitor.go to be more concise and adhere to the DRY principle.

Comment on lines 56 to 64
if err != nil {
// Record endpoint as unreachable
m.RecordEndpointAvailability(chainID, evmClient.GetRPCURL(), false)
return err
}

// Record endpoint as reachable
m.RecordEndpointAvailability(chainID, evmClient.GetRPCURL(), true)
m.RecordJsonRpcRequestDuration(chainID, duration)

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

medium

The logic for recording endpoint availability is present in both the success and failure paths of the health check, leading to some code repetition. You can make this more concise and adhere to the DRY (Don't Repeat Yourself) principle by recording the availability based on the error status before checking the error, and then returning if an error occurred.

Suggested change
if err != nil {
// Record endpoint as unreachable
m.RecordEndpointAvailability(chainID, evmClient.GetRPCURL(), false)
return err
}
// Record endpoint as reachable
m.RecordEndpointAvailability(chainID, evmClient.GetRPCURL(), true)
m.RecordJsonRpcRequestDuration(chainID, duration)
m.RecordEndpointAvailability(chainID, evmClient.GetRPCURL(), err == nil)
if err != nil {
return err
}
m.RecordJsonRpcRequestDuration(chainID, duration)

@@ -0,0 +1,2 @@
[tools]
go = "latest"

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

medium

Using go = "latest" can lead to non-reproducible builds. When a new version of Go is released, your build environment could change unexpectedly, potentially causing build failures or introducing subtle bugs. It is a best practice to pin dependencies and tool versions to ensure consistent builds across all environments. The go.mod file specifies version 1.24.6, so it would be best to align with that here.

Suggested change
go = "latest"
go = "1.24.6"

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants