Skip to content

Conversation

EmmanuelBerkowicz
Copy link
Contributor

Add @DisplayName annotations to swift-scheduling tests

Replace existing @DisplayName annotations with canonical descriptions from problem-specifications to ensure consistency across tracks.

pull request

Summary

Replace existing @DisplayName annotations in swift-scheduling tests with canonical descriptions from problem-specifications to ensure consistency across tracks.

Changes Made

  • Updated all 16 test methods with canonical descriptions from canonical-data.json
  • Maintained existing test logic and functionality
  • Only modified @DisplayName annotations for better test output readability

Example

Before:

@DisplayName("NOW at 9 AM")

After:
@DisplayName("NOW translates to two hours later")


Reviewer Resources:

Track Policies

Add @DisplayName annotations to swift-scheduling tests

Replace existing @DisplayName annotations with canonical descriptions
from problem-specifications to ensure consistency across tracks.
Copy link
Contributor

This PR touches files which potentially affect the outcome of the tests of an exercise. This will cause all students' solutions to affected exercises to be re-tested.

If this PR does not affect the result of the test (or, for example, adds an edge case that is not worth rerunning all tests for), please add the following to the merge-commit message which will stops student's tests from re-running. Please copy-paste to avoid typos.

[no important files changed]

For more information, refer to the documentation. If you are unsure whether to add the message or not, please ping @exercism/maintainers-admin in a comment. Thank you!

@jagdish-15 jagdish-15 added the x:rep/small Small amount of reputation label Jul 15, 2025
@jagdish-15 jagdish-15 merged commit f02bae3 into exercism:main Jul 22, 2025
4 checks passed
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

x:rep/small Small amount of reputation

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants