Skip to content

Conversation

@petercordia
Copy link

Slightly niche, but I did see a solution that succeeded in all the current test cases but failed for "mystery". Due to the way the logic that looks for the 'y' can be (mis)handled.

Whilst looking through the python pig-latin exercise, I noticed another test case that has been added to this file 2 weeks ago which still isn't tested for on the Python exercise as of today (21-12-2024).

Apologies if this isn't the most helpful way to point out these issues.

Slightly niche, but I did see a solution that succeeded in all the current test cases but failed for "mystery". Due to the way the logic that looks for the 'y' can be (mis)handled.
@github-actions
Copy link
Contributor

Hello. Thanks for opening a PR on Exercism 🙂

We ask that all changes to Exercism are discussed on our Community Forum before being opened on GitHub. To enforce this, we automatically close all PRs that are submitted. That doesn't mean your PR is rejected but that we want the initial discussion about it to happen on our forum where a wide range of key contributors across the Exercism ecosystem can weigh in.

You can use this link to copy this into a new topic on the forum. If we decide the PR is appropriate, we'll reopen it and continue with it, so please don't delete your local branch.

If you're interested in learning more about this auto-responder, please read this blog post.


Note: If this PR has been pre-approved, please link back to this PR on the forum thread and a maintainer or staff member will reopen it.

@github-actions github-actions bot closed this Dec 21, 2024
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant