two-bucket: test buckets with a big difference in size

[nix-gh]

Those tests have been discussed here : https://forum.exercism.org/t/adding-tests-to-the-two-bucket-exercise/19163

There goal is to verify the solution is able to do several pour without refilling or emptying a bucket. This should catch some common pitfall when implementing it with Diophantine equations.

I added some randomly generated v4 uuid. I'm not sure if it's ok or if it should come from something else.

[github-actions]

Hello. Thanks for opening a PR on Exercism 🙂

We ask that all changes to Exercism are discussed on our Community Forum before being opened on GitHub. To enforce this, we automatically close all PRs that are submitted. That doesn't mean your PR is rejected but that we want the initial discussion about it to happen on our forum where a wide range of key contributors across the Exercism ecosystem can weigh in.

You can use this link to copy this into a new topic on the forum. If we decide the PR is appropriate, we'll reopen it and continue with it, so please don't delete your local branch.

If you're interested in learning more about this auto-responder, please read this blog post.

---

Note: If this PR has been pre-approved, please link back to this PR on the forum thread and a maintainer or staff member will reopen it.

[IsaacG]

I think it would be good to give maintainers at least 24 hours here to double check prior to merging.

[BethanyG]

I have yet to test these for my track, but am fine with merging them. I can always omit them if they create issues.

[nix-gh]

I have yet to test these for my track, but am fine with merging them. I can always omit them if they create issues.

Please take the time to do it, I was a bit surprised there is no automatic way to test the tests data. I guess it's not easy to put in place. So better double checking before merging in main. I paid attention but I'm human, a copy/past error can happen.