Skip to content

Conversation

@xanni
Copy link
Contributor

@xanni xanni commented Nov 4, 2024

Clarify that the built-in exponentiation operator ** is equivalent to pow() and therefore doesn't demonstrate an implementation of a square root algorithm, and also note that for the domain of this exercise there are available solutions using only positive integers.

Clarify that the built-in exponentiation operator ** is equivalent to pow() and therefore doesn't demonstrate an implementation of a square root algorithm, and also note that for the domain of this exercise there are available solutions using only positive integers.
@github-actions

This comment was marked as resolved.

@github-actions github-actions bot closed this Nov 4, 2024
@BethanyG BethanyG reopened this Nov 4, 2024
Copy link
Member

@BethanyG BethanyG left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

🎉 Thank you for this. I made one suggestion. We try to to format our markdown documents so that there is one sentence per line. They are easier to maintain that way, and the markdown engine concatenates them for us.

Other than that, this looks great, so I approved. I'll wait on your change/acceptance to merge it. 😄

Adhere to one sentence per line convention.

Co-authored-by: BethanyG <[email protected]>
@BethanyG BethanyG merged commit e8b7192 into exercism:main Nov 4, 2024
8 checks passed
@xanni xanni deleted the patch-1 branch November 5, 2024 19:38
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants