Response Groundedness

src/ragas/metrics/collections/__init__.py

@@ -7,8 +7,10 @@
 from ragas.metrics.collections._bleu_score import BleuScore
 from ragas.metrics.collections._context_entity_recall import ContextEntityRecall
 from ragas.metrics.collections._context_relevance import ContextRelevance
+from ragas.metrics.collections._factual_correctness import FactualCorrectness
 from ragas.metrics.collections._faithfulness import Faithfulness
 from ragas.metrics.collections._noise_sensitivity import NoiseSensitivity
+from ragas.metrics.collections._response_groundedness import ResponseGroundedness
 from ragas.metrics.collections._rouge_score import RougeScore
 from ragas.metrics.collections._semantic_similarity import SemanticSimilarity
 from ragas.metrics.collections._string import (
@@ -31,9 +33,11 @@
     "ContextRelevance",
     "DistanceMeasure",
     "ExactMatch",
+    "FactualCorrectness",
     "Faithfulness",
     "NoiseSensitivity",
     "NonLLMStringSimilarity",
+    "ResponseGroundedness",
     "RougeScore",
     "SemanticSimilarity",
     "StringPresence",

src/ragas/metrics/collections/_factual_correctness.py

@@ -0,0 +1,359 @@
+"""Factual Correctness metric v2 - Modern implementation with multi-modal scoring."""
+
+import typing as t
+from typing import List
+
+import numpy as np
+from pydantic import BaseModel
+
+from ragas.metrics.collections.base import BaseMetric
+from ragas.metrics.result import MetricResult
+from ragas.metrics.utils import fbeta_score
+from ragas.prompt.metrics.common import nli_statement_prompt
+
+if t.TYPE_CHECKING:
+    from ragas.llms.base import InstructorBaseRagasLLM
+
+
+class ClaimDecompositionOutput(BaseModel):
+    """Structured output for claim decomposition."""
+
+    claims: List[str]
+
+
+class StatementFaithfulnessAnswer(BaseModel):
+    """Individual statement with reason and verdict for NLI evaluation."""
+
+    statement: str
+    reason: str
+    verdict: int
+
+
+class NLIStatementOutput(BaseModel):
+    """Structured output for NLI statement evaluation."""
+
+    statements: List[StatementFaithfulnessAnswer]
+
+
+def claim_decomposition_prompt(
+    response: str, atomicity: str = "low", coverage: str = "low"
+) -> str:
+    """
+    V1-identical claim decomposition prompt with configurable atomicity/coverage.
+
+    Args:
+        response: The response text to break down into claims
+        atomicity: Level of atomicity ("low" or "high")
+        coverage: Level of coverage ("low" or "high")
+
+    Returns:
+        V1-identical prompt string for the LLM
+    """
+    import json
+
+    safe_response = json.dumps(response)
+
+    # Select examples based on atomicity and coverage configuration
+    if atomicity == "low" and coverage == "low":
+        examples = [
+            {
+                "input": {
+                    "response": "Charles Babbage was a French mathematician, philosopher, and food critic."
+                },
+                "output": {
+                    "claims": ["Charles Babbage was a mathematician and philosopher."]
+                },
+            },
+            {
+                "input": {
+                    "response": "Albert Einstein was a German theoretical physicist. He developed the theory of relativity and also contributed to the development of quantum mechanics."
+                },
+                "output": {
+                    "claims": [
+                        "Albert Einstein was a German physicist.",
+                        "Albert Einstein developed relativity and contributed to quantum mechanics.",
+                    ]
+                },
+            },
+        ]
+    elif atomicity == "low" and coverage == "high":
+        examples = [
+            {
+                "input": {
+                    "response": "Charles Babbage was a French mathematician, philosopher, and food critic."
+                },
+                "output": {
+                    "claims": [
+                        "Charles Babbage was a French mathematician, philosopher, and food critic."
+                    ]
+                },
+            },
+            {
+                "input": {
+                    "response": "Albert Einstein was a German theoretical physicist. He developed the theory of relativity and also contributed to the development of quantum mechanics."
+                },
+                "output": {
+                    "claims": [
+                        "Albert Einstein was a German theoretical physicist.",
+                        "Albert Einstein developed the theory of relativity and also contributed to the development of quantum mechanics.",
+                    ]
+                },
+            },
+        ]
+    elif atomicity == "high" and coverage == "low":
+        examples = [
+            {
+                "input": {
+                    "response": "Charles Babbage was a French mathematician, philosopher, and food critic."
+                },
+                "output": {
+                    "claims": [
+                        "Charles Babbage was a mathematician.",
+                        "Charles Babbage was a philosopher.",
+                    ]
+                },
+            },
+            {
+                "input": {
+                    "response": "Albert Einstein was a German theoretical physicist. He developed the theory of relativity and also contributed to the development of quantum mechanics."
+                },
+                "output": {
+                    "claims": [
+                        "Albert Einstein was a German theoretical physicist.",
+                        "Albert Einstein developed the theory of relativity.",
+                    ]
+                },
+            },
+        ]
+    else:  # high atomicity, high coverage
+        examples = [
+            {
+                "input": {
+                    "response": "Charles Babbage was a French mathematician, philosopher, and food critic."
+                },
+                "output": {
+                    "claims": [
+                        "Charles Babbage was a mathematician.",
+                        "Charles Babbage was a philosopher.",
+                        "Charles Babbage was a food critic.",
+                        "Charles Babbage was French.",
+                    ]
+                },
+            },
+            {
+                "input": {
+                    "response": "Albert Einstein was a German theoretical physicist. He developed the theory of relativity and also contributed to the development of quantum mechanics."
+                },
+                "output": {
+                    "claims": [
+                        "Albert Einstein was a German theoretical physicist.",
+                        "Albert Einstein developed the theory of relativity.",
+                        "Albert Einstein contributed to the development of quantum mechanics.",
+                    ]
+                },
+            },
+        ]
+
+    # Build examples string
+    examples_str = "\n".join(
+        [
+            f"""Example {i + 1}
+Input: {json.dumps(ex["input"], indent=4)}
+Output: {json.dumps(ex["output"], indent=4)}"""
+            for i, ex in enumerate(examples)
+        ]
+    )
+
+    return f"""Decompose and break down each of the input sentences into one or more standalone statements. Each statement should be a standalone claim that can be independently verified.
+Follow the level of atomicity and coverage as shown in the examples.
+Please return the output in a JSON format that complies with the following schema as specified in JSON Schema:
+{{"properties": {{"claims": {{"description": "Decomposed Claims", "items": {{"type": "string"}}, "title": "Claims", "type": "array"}}}}, "required": ["claims"], "title": "ClaimDecompositionOutput", "type": "object"}}Do not use single quotes in your response but double quotes,properly escaped with a backslash.
+
+--------EXAMPLES-----------
+{examples_str}
+-----------------------------
+
+Now perform the same with the following input
+input: {{
+    "response": {safe_response}
+}}
+Output: """
+
+
+class FactualCorrectness(BaseMetric):
+    """
+    Modern v2 implementation of factual correctness evaluation.
+
+    Evaluates the factual correctness of responses by comparing claims made in the response
+    against a reference text. Uses claim decomposition and natural language inference (NLI)
+    to verify claims in both directions.
+
+    The metric supports three evaluation modes:
+    - Precision: What fraction of response claims are supported by reference
+    - Recall: What fraction of reference claims are covered by response
+    - F1: Harmonic mean of precision and recall (with configurable beta)
+
+    The metric also supports configurable claim decomposition:
+    - Atomicity: "low" (fewer, broader claims) vs "high" (more, atomic claims)
+    - Coverage: "low" (partial coverage) vs "high" (comprehensive coverage)
+
+    Usage:
+        >>> import instructor
+        >>> from openai import AsyncOpenAI
+        >>> from ragas.llms.base import llm_factory
+        >>> from ragas.metrics.collections import FactualCorrectness
+        >>>
+        >>> # Setup dependencies
+        >>> client = AsyncOpenAI()
+        >>> llm = llm_factory("gpt-4o-mini", client=client)
+        >>>
+        >>> # Create metric instance
+        >>> metric = FactualCorrectness(llm=llm, mode="f1", beta=1.0)
+        >>>
+        >>> # Single evaluation
+        >>> result = await metric.ascore(
+        ...     response="Einstein was born in Germany in 1879.",
+        ...     reference="Albert Einstein was born in Ulm, Germany on March 14, 1879."
+        ... )
+        >>> print(f"Factual Correctness: {result.value}")
+
+    Attributes:
+        llm: Modern instructor-based LLM for claim decomposition and NLI evaluation
+        mode: Evaluation mode ("precision", "recall", or "f1")
+        beta: Beta parameter for F1 score (>1 favors recall, <1 favors precision)
+        atomicity: Claim decomposition atomicity ("low" or "high")
+        coverage: Claim decomposition coverage ("low" or "high")
+        name: The metric name
+        allowed_values: Score range (0.0 to 1.0, higher is better)
+    """
+
+    # Type hints for linter (attributes are set in __init__)
+    llm: "InstructorBaseRagasLLM"
+
+    def __init__(
+        self,
+        llm: "InstructorBaseRagasLLM",
+        mode: t.Literal["precision", "recall", "f1"] = "f1",
+        beta: float = 1.0,
+        atomicity: t.Literal["low", "high"] = "low",
+        coverage: t.Literal["low", "high"] = "low",
+        name: str = "factual_correctness",
+        **kwargs,
+    ):
+        """
+        Initialize FactualCorrectness metric with required components.
+
+        Args:
+            llm: Modern instructor-based LLM for claim decomposition and NLI evaluation
+            mode: Evaluation mode ("precision", "recall", or "f1")
+            beta: Beta parameter for F1 score (>1 favors recall, <1 favors precision)
+            atomicity: Claim decomposition atomicity ("low" or "high")
+            coverage: Claim decomposition coverage ("low" or "high")
+            name: The metric name
+        """
+        # Set attributes explicitly before calling super()
+        self.llm = llm
+        self.mode = mode
+        self.beta = beta
+        self.atomicity = atomicity
+        self.coverage = coverage
+
+        # Validate beta parameter
+        if not isinstance(beta, (int, float)):
+            raise ValueError(
+                "Beta must be a float. A beta > 1 gives more weight to recall, while beta < 1 favors precision."
+            )
+
+        # Call super() for validation (without passing llm in kwargs)
+        super().__init__(name=name, **kwargs)
+
+    async def ascore(self, response: str, reference: str) -> MetricResult:
+        """
+        Calculate factual correctness score.
+
+        Args:
+            response: The response to evaluate for factual correctness
+            reference: The reference text to check claims against
+
+        Returns:
+            MetricResult with factual correctness score (0.0-1.0, higher is better)
+        """
+        # Input validation
+        if not response:
+            raise ValueError(
+                "response is missing. Please add response to the test sample."
+            )
+        if not reference:
+            raise ValueError(
+                "reference is missing. Please add reference to the test sample."
+            )
+
+        # Step 1: Get claim verifications based on mode
+        if self.mode != "precision":
+            # For recall and f1: response claims → reference verification
+            response_verified = await self._decompose_and_verify_claims(
+                response, reference
+            )
+        else:
+            response_verified = np.array([], dtype=bool)
+
+        if self.mode != "recall":
+            # For precision and f1: reference claims → response verification
+            reference_verified = await self._decompose_and_verify_claims(
+                reference, response
+            )
+        else:
+            reference_verified = np.array([], dtype=bool)
+
+        # Step 2: Compute TP, FP, FN
+        if self.mode != "precision":
+            tp = int(np.sum(response_verified))
+            fn = int(np.sum(~response_verified))
+        else:
+            tp = int(np.sum(reference_verified))
+            fn = 0
+
+        if self.mode != "recall":
+            fp = int(np.sum(~reference_verified))
+        else:
+            fp = 0
+
+        # Step 3: Compute final score based on mode
+        if self.mode == "precision":
+            score = tp / (tp + fp + 1e-8)
+        elif self.mode == "recall":
+            score = tp / (tp + fn + 1e-8)
+        else:  # f1
+            score = fbeta_score(tp, fp, fn, self.beta)
+
+        return MetricResult(value=float(np.round(score, 2)))
+
+    async def _decompose_claims(self, response: str) -> List[str]:
+        """Break response into claims using configurable decomposition."""
+        prompt = claim_decomposition_prompt(
+            response, atomicity=self.atomicity, coverage=self.coverage
+        )
+        result = await self.llm.agenerate(prompt, ClaimDecompositionOutput)
+        return result.claims
+
+    async def _verify_claims(
+        self, claims: List[str], reference: str
+    ) -> NLIStatementOutput:
+        """Verify claims against reference using NLI."""
+        prompt = nli_statement_prompt(reference, claims)
+        result = await self.llm.agenerate(prompt, NLIStatementOutput)
+        return result
+
+    async def _decompose_and_verify_claims(
+        self, text_to_decompose: str, reference_text: str
+    ) -> np.ndarray:
+        """Decompose text into claims and verify against reference."""
+        claims = await self._decompose_claims(text_to_decompose)
+        if not claims:
+            return np.array([], dtype=bool)
+
+        verdicts = await self._verify_claims(claims, reference_text)
+        if not verdicts.statements:
+            return np.array([], dtype=bool)
+
+        return np.array([bool(stmt.verdict) for stmt in verdicts.statements])