Move behat.yml to behat.yml.dist

[joaoinacio]

behat config can require changes to match the current environment (most notably the hostname/url),
as well as any other custom configurations.

For this reason, ideally it should be kept outside of git repo, and instead use a default/dist file
(much in the same way as ezpublish.yml)

This changes the file name, updates travis script accordingly, and updates .gitignore.

[joaoinacio]

review ping @andrerom @bdunogier

[andrerom]

Might make more sense to do this during build, but depends on a few things including how we deal with upgrades in the future.

[joaoinacio]

@andrerom:
I'll leave this as is now; feel free to comment/close/merge as necessary.
Thanks for the feedback!

(on a side note, the test fail is due to the demo package naming)

[bdunogier]

I don't have a strong preference. What @andrerom suggests makes a bit more sense, I think: what's on GIT is testable, and the distribution is not.

On the other hand, given that we kind of encourage people to run from GIT, it kind of defeats the purpose of the renaming if we only do it for builds :(

[andrerom]

Returning a bit to this discussion, should we move in direction of having most of these kind of files as "dist"? Thinking of our files as distribution basically, to not conflict with project files. What do you think @bdunogier & @lolautruche ?

[joaoinacio]

gentle ping @andrerom @bdunogier @lolautruche :)

[andrerom]

@joaoinacio can instead use the c argument of behat for travis.yml, cleaner, easier to spot

[bdunogier]

Is it expected that it fails, @joaoinacio ?

That aside, +1.

[andrerom]

+1. also need this on ezplatform