Search results

Unable to Reproduce Results for WRN-28-10

Status: Open.

#26 In facebookresearch/mixup-cifar10;

· humza909 opened on Dec 1, 2022

Why we call Mix-up method as data augmentation technique?

Status: Open.

#25 In facebookresearch/mixup-cifar10;

· Nafees-060 opened on Jan 14, 2022

what should I change if I want to use the concept of MixUp on my dataset

Status: Open.

#24 In facebookresearch/mixup-cifar10;

· Oussamab21 opened on Oct 18, 2021

No Validation Set

Status: Open.

#23 In facebookresearch/mixup-cifar10;

· 07Agarg opened on Jul 5, 2021

PreResNet - wrong implementation of shortcut

Status: Open.

#20 In facebookresearch/mixup-cifar10;

· emrahyigit opened on Sep 28, 2020

No implementation for wide resnet

Status: Open.

#19 In facebookresearch/mixup-cifar10;

· FengHZ opened on Jul 6, 2019

Different mixup loss function between code and paper

Status: Open.

#18 In facebookresearch/mixup-cifar10;

· lukk47 opened on Apr 23, 2019

test accuracy truncated to integer

Status: Open.

#17 In facebookresearch/mixup-cifar10;

· gobbedy opened on Mar 30, 2019

reg_loss printed but not modified in train.py

Status: Open.

#16 In facebookresearch/mixup-cifar10;

· gobbedy opened on Mar 30, 2019

train.py giving index error

Status: Open.

#13 In facebookresearch/mixup-cifar10;

· ArmaanBhullar opened on Feb 24, 2019

should I transfer the label into one-hot?

Status: Open.

#9 In facebookresearch/mixup-cifar10;

· sxzy opened on Oct 25, 2018