⚡️ Speed up function get_benchmark_names by 9%
#333
Closed
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
📄 9% (0.09x) speedup for
get_benchmark_namesinbench_runner/scripts/run_benchmarks.py⏱️ Runtime :
920 microseconds→845 microseconds(best of262runs)📝 Explanation and details
Certainly! Let's optimize the given code by reducing the use of external subprocess calls and handling string operations more efficiently. Additionally, we can avoid unnecessary condition checks within the loop. Here is the optimized version of the
get_benchmark_namesfunction.Explanation of Changes
Conditional Assignment:
benchmarks = "all" if benchmarks.strip() == "" else benchmarksto set benchmarks, instead of using a separate conditional block.List Comprehension.
Removed Unnecessary Operations.
.strip()after[2:]as it wasn't necessary according to the provided snippet. This ensures we are not redundantly stripping characters from the strings.✅ Correctness verification report:
🌀 Generated Regression Tests Details
📢 Feedback on this optimization?