Skip to content
This repository was archived by the owner on Nov 8, 2019. It is now read-only.

Conversation

@hhorak
Copy link
Contributor

@hhorak hhorak commented Mar 31, 2016

Similar PR to #193. These changes are based on the code that from https://github.com/openshift/mysql, but it does not include some recent changes in the scripts. Even if the image is meant to work in OpenShift, it doesn't mean that it shouldn't work outside of OpenShift -- the opposite is true, the image should be usable on Atomic or normal Fedora Server/Workstation/Cloud without any issues as well.

I'd like to apology in advance that I won't be responsive in next two weeks, since I'll be off-line.

hhorak added a commit to hhorak/Fedora-Dockerfiles that referenced this pull request May 26, 2016
These changes are based on the code that from https://github.com/sclorg/mariadb-container.
Even if the image is meant to work in OpenShift, it doesn't mean that it shouldn't
work outside of OpenShift -- the opposite is true, the image should be usable on
Atomic or normal Fedora Server/Workstation/Cloud without any issues as well.
@hhorak
Copy link
Contributor Author

hhorak commented May 26, 2016

I've created a new variant of this PR: #220, closing this one.

@hhorak hhorak closed this May 26, 2016
hhorak added a commit to hhorak/Fedora-Dockerfiles that referenced this pull request May 26, 2016
These changes are based on the code that from https://github.com/sclorg/mariadb-container.
Even if the image is meant to work in OpenShift, it doesn't mean that it shouldn't
work outside of OpenShift -- the opposite is true, the image should be usable on
Atomic or normal Fedora Server/Workstation/Cloud without any issues as well.
baude added a commit that referenced this pull request May 27, 2016
Sign up for free to subscribe to this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in.

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant